Third Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc.
| Decision Date | 04 January 1972 |
| Citation | 360 Mass. 871,277 N.E.2d 824 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
| Parties | THIRD NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO., Executor, v. REITER OLDSMOBILE, INC. |
Gerard L. Pellegrini, Springfield, for plaintiff.
Philip J. Shine, Springfield, for defendant.
Before TAURO, C.J., and CUTTER, QUIRICO, BRAUCHER and HENNESSEY, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
The judge directed a verdict for the defendant in this action of tort and contract for fire damage to a building caused by the negligence of the defendant tenant. The judge did not require the defendant to specify the reasons on which its motion for a directed verdict was based, but stated for the record that it was the judge's opinion that the lessee was exempted from liability by a clause in the lease, It is therefore open to the defendant to support the ruling on another ground. Connors v. Wick, 317 Mass. 628, 630, 59 N.E.2d 277; McKinstry v. New York, N.H. & H.R.R., 338 Mass. 785, 153 N.E.2d 764. As the defendant points out, the bill of exceptions does not disclose sufficient evidence of negligence to warrant a finding for the plaintiff. The defendant's service manager testified that he was responsible for a portable electric heater, that he turned it off each night, and that he did not recall turning it off on the Friday night in question. A lieutenant from the State fire marshal's office gave the opinion that the fire, which was reported the following Sunday afternoon, was caused by an overheated portable electric heater left running. This testimony does not exclude the possibility that the fire resulted from a defect in the heater of which the defendant had no notice. Hence a finding of negligence would have rested in surmise and conjecture. Wardwell v. George H. Taylor Co., 333 Mass. 302, 305, 130 N.E.2d 586; Dolan v. Suffolk Franklin Sav. Bank, 355 Mass. 665, 669--670, 246 N.E.2d 798.
Exceptions overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Alholm v. Town of Wareham
...will be upheld if there is any valid ground on which the motion should have been granted. 3 Third Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc., 360 Mass. 871, 277 N.E.2d 824 (1972). Greeley v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Framingham, 350 Mass. 549, 215 N.E.2d 791 (1966); McKinstry v. New Y......
-
Currie v. Lee Equipment Corp.
...Mass. 776, 242 N.E.2d 853; Dolan v. Suffolk Franklin Sav. Bank, 355 Mass. 665, 669--670, 246 N.E.2d 798; Third Natl. Bank & Trust Co. v. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc., Mass., 277 N.E.2d 824. a This holds true, notwithstanding that an expert has testified that the cause of the accident was the def......
-
Donahoe v. Maggiano's Holding Corp.
...a portable electric heater every night, who did not remember turning it off on a certain Friday. Third Nat. Bank Trust Co. v. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc. , 360 Mass. 871, 277 N.E.2d 824 (1972). A fire started the following Sunday, and the fire marshal's office gave the opinion that the fire sta......
- Mercier v. Jones