THIRD NATIONAL BANK IN NASHVILLE v. United States

Decision Date28 May 1970
Docket NumberNo. 19741.,19741.
Citation427 F.2d 343
PartiesTHIRD NATIONAL BANK IN NASHVILLE, William F. Howard and Laurence B. Howard, Jr., Co-Executors of the Estate of Ellen F. Stempfel, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Stuart A. Smith, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief; Charles H. Anderson, U. S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., of counsel, for appellant.

William F. Howard, Nashville, Tenn., Boult, Hunt, Cummings & Conners, Nashville, Tenn., on the brief, for appellees.

Before WEICK and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and O'SULLIVAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.

In this case the United States appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. In a careful opinion the United States District Judge held that legal fees arising out of an appraisal proceeding through which taxpayers'1 minority stockholding was appraised for purposes of a merger acquisition were ordinary and necessary business expenses and deductible under section 212 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The District Judge relied largely upon Heller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 T.C. 371 (1943), aff'd, 147 F.2d 376 (9th Cir.), cert. denied., 325 U.S. 868, 65 S.Ct. 1405, 89 L.Ed. 1987 (1945).

Since the decision of this case in the United States District Court, the United States Supreme Court has decided Woodward v. Commissioner, 397 U.S. 572, 90 S.Ct. 1302, 25 L.Ed.2d 577 (1970), and United States v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 397 U.S. 580, 90 S.Ct. 1307, 25 L.Ed.2d 585 (1970). In these two cases the Supreme Court effectively reversed the Heller case upon which the District Court had relied. The Supreme Court held:

"It has long been recognized, as a general matter, that costs incurred in the acquisition or disposition of a capital asset are to be treated as capital expenditures. The most familiar example of such treatment is the capitalization of brokerage fees for the sale or purchase of securities, as explicitly provided by longstanding Treasury regulation, Treas.Reg. 1.263 (a)-2(e), and as approved by this Court in Helvering v. Winmill, 305 U.S. 79, 59 S.Ct. 45, 83 L.Ed. 52 (1938) and Spreckels v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 315 U.S. 626, 62 S.Ct. 777, 86 L.Ed. 1073 (1942). The Court recognized that brokers\' commissions are `part of the acquisition cost of the securities,\' Helvering v. Winmill, supra, at 84, 59 S.Ct. at 47, and relied on the Treasury regulation, which had been approved by statutory reenactment, to deny deductions for such commissions even to a taxpayer for whom they were a regular and recurring expense in his business of buying and selling securities.
"The regulations do not specify other sorts of acquisition costs, but rather provide generally that `the cost of acquisition * * * of * * * property having a useful life substantially beyond the taxable year\' is a capital expenditure. Treas.Reg. 1.263(a)-2 (a). Under this general provision, the courts have held that legal, brokerage, accounting and similar costs incurred in the acquisition or disposition of such property are capital expenditures. See, e. g., Spangler v. Commissioner, 323 F.2d 913, 921 (C.A. 9th Cir. 1963); United States v. St. Joe Paper Co., 284 F.2d 430, 432 (C.A. 5th Cir. 1960). See generally 4A J. Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation §§ 25.25, 25.26, 25.40, 25A.15 (1966 ed.). The law could hardly be otherwise, for such ancillary expenses incurred in acquiring or disposing of an asset are as much part of the
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Estate of Meade v. CIR
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • March 5, 1974
    ...expenditures, which enter into the computation of gain or loss arising from the distribution. See, e. g., Third National Bank v. United States, 6 Cir., 1970, 427 F.2d 343; Helgerson v. United States, 8 Cir., 1970, 426 F.2d 1293; Estate of McGlothlin v. C.I. R., 5 Cir., 1967, 370 F.2d The Su......
  • Matter of Federated Dept. Stores, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Sixth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • January 8, 1992
    ...or enhance a distinct additional asset. Lincoln, supra, 403 U.S. at 354, 91 S.Ct. at 1899. See also, Third Nat'l Bank in Nashville v. United States, 427 F.2d 343 (6th Cir.1970) (costs of disposing of securities is a capital The Debtors argue here that the breakup fees are deductible as ordi......
  • Reed v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
    • United States
    • United States Tax Court
    • October 8, 1970
    ...Cf. Anchor Coupling Co. v. United States, supra at 433; see also Helgerson v. United States, supra; Third National Bank of Nashville v. United States, 427 F.2d 343 (C.A. 6, 1970), reversing an unreported case Stempfel (formerly Howard) v. United States, (M.D.Tenn 1969, A.F.T.R.2d 69-684, 69......
  • Webbe v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • United States Tax Court
    • August 26, 1987
    ...be made to the basis in petitioner's Aladdin stock. See Third National Bank in Nashville v. United States 70-1 USTC ¶ 9430, 427 F.2d 343, 344 (6th Cir. 1970); Neely v. Commissioner Dec. 42,540, 85 T.C. 934, 953-955 (1985); Ward v. Commissioner Dec. 19,661, 20 T.C. 332, 342-343 (1953), affd.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT