Thomas v. Anderson
| Decision Date | 07 March 1950 |
| Citation | 215 P.2d 478,96 Cal.App.2d 371 |
| Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Parties | THOMAS v. ANDERSON et al. Civ. 4008. |
C. Ray Robinson, W. Eugene Craven, Margaret A. Flynn, Merced, for appellant.
Crossland & Crossland, Wm. C. Crossland, Robert S. Crossland, Fresno, for respondents.
This action to quiet title arose out of the circumstances attending the deaths of John F. Thomas and Rhomus C. Sturgeon, who, as joint tenants, owned the real and personal property herein involved. Both men died between the hours of Nine and Ten o'clock on the evening of September 2, 1947, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment in which it was decreed that Rhomus C. Sturgeon survived John F. Thomas; that upon his death his joint tenancy interest terminated and the title to the property vested in Rhomus C. Sturgeon.
The controversy involves the application of the provisions of section 296.2 of the Probate Code, which are as follows: 'Where there is no sufficient evidence that two joint tenants have died otherwise than simultaneously the property so held shall be distributed one-half as if one had survived and one-half as if the other had survived.'
Plaintiff contends (1) that the evidence is not sufficient to support the finding of the trial court that the two deaths in this instance did not occur simultaneously; and (2) that under section 296.2 of the Proate Code, deaths are simultaneous if they occur substantially or approximately at the same time.
Mr. Thomas and Mr. Sturgeon were elderly gentlemen with heart ailments and were living in a home owned by them in the city of Fresno, and on the evening of September 2nd, at about 9:00 o'clock, they were observed sitting together on the front porch of their home. Shortly thereafter, Mrs. Sanders, who lived next door, heard Sturgeon, who was in the backyard, say 'What is the matter, John, what is the matter'. She ran outside and Sturgeon asked her to call the doctor. She called Mr. and Mrs. Shattuck, who lived next door, and Mr. Shattuck ran over while Mrs. Sanders went inside to use the phone.
Mr. Shattuck testified that when called by Mrs. Sanders, he went over to the house and saw Mr. Thomas lying on the ground on his back, face up; that Sturgeon was leaning over and had his head lowered to Mr. Thomas' chest; that Sturgeon was feeling or handling Thomas' wrist and that Sturgeon asked him to call a priest; that Shattuck turned Thomas over, got him in position and gave him artificial respiration for a few minutes until Thomas took about three or four gasping breaths; that they were temple for a pulse and did not feel any; that at about the precise moment when he was feeling for a pulse, he heard a thump or falling sound in the house; that after he felt for the pulse at the temple, he felt for a pulse at the wrist; that he could not feel any pulse at the wrist at all and that Thomas started to turn and discolor very readily; that he put his face down to Thomas' chest and to his mouth; that there was absolutely no breathing; that he then proceeded into the house and found Sturgeon lying with his head on the piano pedals; that Sturgeon was then breathing; that he proceeded to turn Sturgeon over on his back, straighten him out on the floor and to give him artificial respiration; that he continued to give artificial respiration until he could no longer hear or see breathing; that he was still working over Sturgeon when the fire department arrived and that Sturgeon appeared to be still alive; that he was breathing, his breaths were far apart, or were not natural but he was alive.
The fire chief of the city of Fresno, who was experienced in rescue work and in first aid, testified that he arrived at the scene at about 9:36 P.M. and saw Thomas lying on the ground, back of the house; that he could not find any pulse beat; that Thomas' face had become discolored and that the body was cool; that 'if the body is warm, there is a faint hope of reviving a person; if it is cold, there is no hope'; that they had just started to set up their resuscitating machine, when 'they' were informed that there was another man in the house that 'they' thought was still alive; that they then went to work on Mr. Sturgeon, who was lying on the floor; that he examined him, felt his wrist; that Sturgeon was warm and had good color; that he detected a slight pulse.
A fire department captain, who was also experienced in first aid and rescue work, testified that he examined a man lying on the ground in the backyard, picked up his hand and that when he could detect no pulse, he took his flashlight out, opened the eyes and flashed the light into them; that he could get no movement in the eyes; that the face started to turn a dark, ruddy color; that he was not breathing as far as the witness could determine; that he then sent the squad into the house and went in himself, where he saw Sturgeon on the floor. Sturgeon was warm and his color was good; that they put the resuscitator on Sturgeon and started to work...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wilmington Trust Co. v. Clark
...The common meaning ascribed to that word is the "cessation of life." Black's Law Dictionary 360 (5th ed. 1979); see Thomas v. Anderson, 96 Cal.App.2d 371, 215 P.2d 478 (1950); Eichner v. Dillon, 73 App.Div.2d 431, 426 N.Y.S.2d 517 (1980); State Dept. of Hum. Serv. v. Northern, 563 S.W.2d 19......
-
Eichner v. Dillon
...to resolve questions involving implications of death, see, e. g., Smith v. Smith, 229 Ark. 579, 586, 317 S.W.2d 275; Thomas v. Anderson, 96 Cal.App.2d 371, 376, 215 P.2d 478.) The legal consequences resulting from confusion over the definition of death were illustrated in Douglas v. Southwe......
-
Rowley's Estate, In re
...Cal.App.2d Supp. at p. 900, 270 P.2d at p. 952; and see Estate of Loucks (1911) 160 Cal. 551, 554, 117 P. 673; Thomas v. Anderson (1950) 96 Cal.App.2d 371, 375--376, 215 P.2d 478; Clarke v. Bryson (1934) 136 Cal.App. 521, 523, 29 P.2d 275; Estate of Wallace (1923) 64 Cal.App. 107--110, 220 ......
-
People v. Eulo
...41 N.Y.2d 725, 730-731, 395 N.Y.S.2d 419, 363 N.E.2d 1155; Smith v. Smith, 229 Ark. 579, 586-587, 317 S.W.2d 275; Thomas v. Anderson, 96 Cal.App.2d 371, 375, 215 P.2d 478). (b) Within the past two decades, machines that artificially maintain cardiorespiratory functions have come into widesp......
-
From book covers to domain names: searching for the true meaning of the Cliffs Notes temporal test for parody.
...564 (1936); White v. Taylor, 281 S.W.2d 237, 240 (Tex. Civ. App. 1955), rev'd 286 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. 1956). But cf. Thomas v. Anderson, 96 Cal. App. 2d 371, 375-77 (Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1950). See generally Uniform Simultaneous Death Act [section][section] 2-3 (1993) (adopting survival by 120 ......