Thomas v. Blackwell
Decision Date | 23 August 1995 |
Citation | 219 A.D.2d 795,632 N.Y.S.2d 989 |
Parties | Matter of Alvin THOMAS, Appellant, v. Roger I. BLACKWELL and Ralph M. Mohr, Commissioners of Elections Constituting the Erie County Board of Elections, and David A. Collins, Respondents. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Lovallo & Williams by Timothy R. Lovallo, Buffalo, for appellant, Alvin Thomas.
Richard J. Steiner, Buffalo, for respondent, David A. Collins.
Kenneth A. Schoetz, Buffalo, for respondents, Erie County Board of Elections.
On appeal from an order dismissing his petition to declare a designating petition invalid, petitioner argues that Supreme Court erred in precluding him from raising objections to the designating petition for the first time at the hearing on his petition. We conclude that, under the facts of this case, petitioner was properly precluded from attempting to prove defects not listed in the specifications of objections before the Board of Elections or in the order to show cause (see, Matter of Suarez v. Sadowski, 48 N.Y.2d 620, 421 N.Y.S.2d 50, 396 N.E.2d 198; Matter of Levitt v. Mahoney, 133 A.D.2d 516, 520 N.Y.S.2d 290; Matter of Belak v. Rossi, 96 A.D.2d 1011, 467 N.Y.S.2d 100, lv. denied 60 N.Y.2d 552, 467 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 454 N.E.2d 540).
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J.--Election Law.)
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Santoro v. Schreiber, 2
...in his petitions filed in Supreme Court (see, Matter of Vogel v. Blackwell, 225 A.D.2d 1091, 639 N.Y.S.2d 190; Matter of Thomas v. Blackwell, 219 A.D.2d 795, 632 N.Y.S.2d 989). Fundamental fairness requires that prior notice be given of the basis for the challenge to referendum petitions (s......
-
Vogel v. Blackwell
...the validity of respondent Sullivan's objections, raised for the first time at the hearing on the petition (see, Matter of Thomas v. Blackwell, 219 A.D.2d 795, 632 N.Y.S.2d 989 [decided Aug. 23, 1995]. The court also properly declined to consider the unsubstantiated contention of petitioner......