Thomas v. Lee County
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | MAYES, C. J. |
| Citation | Thomas v. Lee County, 98 Miss. 232, 53 So. 585 (Miss. 1910) |
| Decision Date | 07 November 1910 |
| Parties | J. MURPHY THOMAS v. LEE COUNTY |
October 1910
FROM the chancery court of Lee county, HON. JOHN QUITMAN ROBBINS Chancellor.
Thomas appellant, was complainant in the court below; the members of the board of supervisors of Lee county were, personally made defendants and so were the sheriff and three road commissioners of the county. By order of the court the pleadings are set out in full. The bill of complaint was in words and figures following: J. M. Thomas, ,
v.
Board of Supervisors Lee county et al.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Franklin v. Ellis
... ... 1922, chapter 170 ... HON. G ... E. WILLIAMS, Chancellor ... APPEAL ... from chancery court of Coahoma county, HON. G. E. WILLIAMS, ... Chancellor ... Suit by ... M. H. Ellis and others against L. C. Franklin and others ... From the decree, ... 565; Board v ... Klein, 51 Miss. 807; Gamble v. Witty, 55 Miss ... 26; Rorrenberry v. Yalobusha County, 67 Miss. 740; ... Thomas v. Board of Supervisors, 53 Mo. 585, 98 Miss ... 232; Paxton v. Baum, 59 Miss. 535; Sullivan v ... Board of Supervisors, 58 Miss. 796; Seal ... ...
-
Bacot v. Board of Sup'rs of Hinds County
... ... circuit court as provided by the statute, and that remedy is ... exclusive. See Wolford v. Williams, 110 Miss. 637; ... Johnson v. Board of Supervisors, 74 So. 321; Hinton ... v. Perry County, 84 So. 548 ... It was ... settled by this court in the case of Thomas v. Lee ... County, 53 So. 585, 98 Miss. 232, and in the case of ... Dean v. Desoto County, 82 So., that the filing of ... the petition required by the statute, by the qualified ... electors for the establishment of a road district and the ... issuance of bonds, conferred upon the board of ... ...
-
Board of Highway Commissioners of Edinburg District v. Warren
... ... 2849 Supreme Court of Mississippi January 12, 1920 ... October, ... APPEAL ... from the chancery court of Leake county, HON. A. Y. WOODWARD, ... Chancellor ... Suit ... between the Board of Highway Commissioners of Edinburg road ... district and E. B ... 548. See, ... generally, Dye v. Mayor, 119 Miss. 359 (collateral ... It was ... settled by this court in the case of Thomas v. Lee ... County, 53 So. 585, 95 Miss. 232, and in the case of ... Dean v. Desoto County, 82 So., that the filing of ... the petition required ... ...
-
Ladner v. Road Protection Commission
... ... 27089Supreme Court of MississippiApril 16, 1928 ... Division B ... APPEAL ... from chancery court of Hancock county, HON. V. A. GRIFFITH, ... Chancellor ... [150 ... Miss. 417] Suit by Mrs. Nina Ladner, as a citizen and ... taxpayer, on behalf of ... undertaken the construction of any road, nor the expenditure ... of any road funds ... In ... Thomas v. Board of Supervisors of Lee County, 98 Miss ... 232, 53 So. 585, an attack similar to the one made by ... appellant was made on the ... ...