Thomas v. State
Decision Date | 17 November 1989 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 11 |
Citation | 555 So.2d 320 |
Parties | Henry THOMAS, Jr. v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Charles E. Caldwell, Birmingham, for appellant.
Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Robin Blevins, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Henry Thomas, Jr., was indicted for attempted murder. The jury found the appellant "guilty as charged in the indictment" and the trial judge sentenced the appellant to 25 years' imprisonment in the penitentiary.
The following occurred during the prosecutor's closing argument:
The appellant contends that the prosecutor's argument was an improper comment on his failure to testify and that the trial judge should have declared a mistrial. This issue is not properly before this court because there is no adverse ruling for this court to review. See Britain v. State, 533 So.2d 684 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied (Ala.1988); Hammond v. State, 502 So.2d 843 (Ala.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied (Ala.1987). Furthermore, we do not find that the prosecutor's argument was a comment on the appellant's failure to testify. See Thompson v. State, 527 So.2d 777 (Ala.Crim.App.1988); United States v. Nabors, 762 F.2d 642 (8th Cir.1985). We must also note that the trial judge, in his oral charge to the jury, stated:
(R. 277.)
This issue is without merit.
The appellant contends that the prosecutor violated the principles set out in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), by using three of her peremptory strikes to exclude black males from the jury. The following occurred during the hearing on the appellant's Batson motion:
In order to establish a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination based on the use of peremptory challenges, the United States Supreme Court in Batson stated:
Batson, 476 U.S., at 96, 106 S.Ct., at 1723.
"Once the defendant makes a prima facie showing, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sockwell v. State
...Davis v. State, 596 So.2d 626 (Ala.Crim.App.1991); McLeod v. State, 581 So.2d 1144, 1154-55 (Ala.Crim.App.1990); Thomas v. State, 555 So.2d 320, 322 (Ala.Crim.App.1989); Currin v. State, 535 So.2d 221, 223 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 535 So.2d 225 Once the trial court requires the prosec......
-
Burgess v. State
...who claimed that his alleged accomplices, who were older than he was, had planned the crime and had shot Gardner. See Thomas v. State, 555 So.2d 320, 322 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989) (striking jurors because they were single males did not violate Batson, under the facts of the case, because a single ......
-
Simmons v. State
...has failed to put on evidence as promised by defense counsel is not a comment on the defendant's failure to testify. Thomas v. State, 555 So.2d 320, 320-21 (Ala.Cr.App.1989)."'" Long v. State, 668 So.2d 56, 63 (Ala.Cr.App.1995), quoting Donahoo v. State, 647 So.2d 24, 25-26 (Ala. In Darden ......
-
Jackson v. State
...to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, this Court will review the reasons given by the prosecutor"); Thomas v. State, 555 So.2d 320, 322 (Ala.Cr.App.1989) ("since the prosecutor's reasons for striking [black veniremembers] are on the record, we shall review the sufficiency of he......