Thomas v. State
| Decision Date | 19 May 1909 |
| Citation | 119 S.W. 846 |
| Parties | THOMAS et al. v. STATE. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; James R. Harper, Judge.
Scire facias by the State against W. H. Thomas and another. Judgment for the State, and defendants appeal. On motion to dismiss. Granted.
F. J. McCord, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
This is a scire facias case. The state moves to dismiss this case on the ground that no notice of appeal is given to this court. The record discloses that the appeal is given to the Court of Civil Appeals of the Fourth Supreme Judicial District.
It follows that the motion of the state must be sustained; and it is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Bain v. State
...with Ex parte Moore, supra, which has not been overruled. See also Ayers v. State, 66 Tex.Cr.R. 281, 146 S.W. 171; Thomas & Dockery v. State, 56 Tex.Cr.R. 246, 119 S.W. 846. The appeal is DAVIDSON, Judge (dissenting). For the reason assigned in my dissenting opinion in Ford v. State, Tex.Cr......
-
Ford v. State, 31629
...upon this Court. Ex parte Moore, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 73, 3 S.W.2d 86; Ayers v. State, 66 Tex.Cr.R. 281, 146 S.W. 171; Thomas & Dockery v. State, 56 Tex.Cr.R. 246, 119 S.W. 846. Supplemental transcript has been filed which contains the affidavit of one of the sureties. It adds nothing to the recog......