Thomas v. State, 1D05-2183.
| Decision Date | 21 March 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 1D05-2183.,1D05-2183. |
| Parties | Carlton Tyrone THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Terry P. Roberts, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Appellant appeals the circuit court's denial of his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We find merit in appellant's argument that the circuit court erred when it granted appellant an evidentiary hearing, but failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law respecting the evidence and argument presented at said hearing. We affirm, without comment, as to each of appellant's other claims on appeal.
In the 3.850 motion, filed below, appellant alleged his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request an accomplice jury instruction. The circuit court granted appellant an evidentiary hearing on this claim. However, the order denying appellant's motion for postconviction relief contains no findings of fact or conclusions of law regarding the substance of appellant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim.
"If an evidentiary hearing is required, the court shall . . . determine the issues, and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto." Fla. R.Crim. P. Rule 3.850(d). In the instant case, the trial court erred by failing to make any findings of fact — either orally or in writing. See Dillbeck v. State, 882 So.2d 969, 972 (Fla.2004); see also Jones v. State, 740 So.2d 520, 524 (Fla.1999) (). Due to the trial court's failure, this Court may not reach the merits of appellant's postconviction claim. Rather, we remand this case to the circuit court to make the needed findings. See, e.g., Kornegay v. State, 826 So.2d 1081, 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).1
This matter is AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED in part with directions. On remand, the circuit court is directed to make factual findings and draw legal conclusions regarding appellant's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to request an accomplice liability jury instruction.
1. The record in this case clearly contains competent, substantial evidence upon which the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Applicant v. Sec'y
...of law respecting the evidence and argument presented at the hearing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(d); see also Thomas v. State, 954 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). This Court finds that the Defendant has failed to demonstrate either deficient performance on the part of his former trial counse......
-
Hunter v. State
...court is not empowered to make findings of fact. See Farneth v. State, 945 So.2d 614, 617 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). See also Thomas v. State, 954 So.2d 56 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). When the trial court does not make factual findings at the evidentiary hearing or in the written order, “this court canno......
- State v. Carry
-
McQuitter v. State, 4D11–2419.
...court shall set forth findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by the rule. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d); Thomas v. State, 954 So.2d 56, 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). This decision should not be taken, one way or the other, as an indication of the court's view of the merits of the claim. R......