Thomas v. State
| Decision Date | 03 March 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 36046,36046 |
| Citation | 275 S.E.2d 318,247 Ga. 233 |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
| Parties | THOMAS v. The STATE. |
By its order of November 17, 1980, the Supreme Court of the United States, --- U.S. ----, 101 S.Ct. 523, 66 L.Ed.2d 285, vacated this court's judgment in this case as to the death sentence (245 Ga. 688, 266 S.E.2d 499 (1980)) and remanded for further consideration in light of Godfrey v. Georgia, 446 U.S. 420, 100 S.Ct. 1759, 64 L.Ed.2d 398 (1980). As mandated by order of the Supreme Court of the United States, this court has reexamined the holding in this case that the evidence supports a reasonable trier of facts' finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant's murder of the victim was outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible or inhuman in that it involved torture or depravity of mind. Code Ann. § 27-2534.1(b)(7).
In Hance v. State, 245 Ga. 856, 268 S.E.2d 339 (1980), this court set out standards which must be met in order to constitutionally apply Code Ann. § 27-2534.1(b)(7) in light of Godfrey v. Georgia, supra. We held that "torture," as the term is used in the statute, occurs when the victim is subjected, as in this case, to serious physical abuse prior to death. Furthermore, this court held that serious sexual abuse may be found to constitute serious physical abuse. A defendant who tortures the victim or subjects the victim to an aggravated battery before killing the victim can be found to have a depraved mind. The age and physical characteristics of the victim may be considered in determining "depravity of mind."
By any rational standard, the murder in this case was outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible or inhuman. In that respect, this murder is distinguishable from ordinary murders in which the death penalty is not appropriate. Godfrey v. Georgia, supra; Hance v. State, supra; Cape v. State, 246 Ga. 520, 272 S.E.2d 487 (1980). This was not a domestic murder and the victim gave the appellant no reason to assault him nor was the victim subjecting the appellant to any emotional trauma. The appellant sought to avoid detection of his crime. See Godfrey v. Georgia, supra.
As was set out in the opinion in this case, the evidence shows a brutal strangulation murder of a nine-year-old child who weighed less than 60 pounds. The appellant admitted that he had killed the child by beating him with a stick and choking him to death. Such evidence would support a finding by a rational trier of fact of serious physical abuse prior to death. Later, the appellant took his girl friend to the site of the killing and showed her the body of the victim. In her presence, the appellant rolled the body over and, telling her that he had to make sure that he was dead, the appellant jumped on the neck of the victim and then threw the victim's body in the bushes. See Hance v. State, supra; Fair v. State, 245 Ga. 868, 268 S.E.2d 316 (1980). In addition, the appellant had a large amount of blood on...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Riley v. State
...of mind shown by infliction of mental distress on 5-year-old girl who defendant left near her murdered mother's body); Thomas v. State, 247 Ga. 233, 275 S.E.2d 318 (1981). Considering the foregoing cases, we conclude that the trial court did not err by deciding that there existed sufficient......
-
Pruitt v. State, S98P1962.
...194 (1985); Allen v. State, 253 Ga. 390, 321 S.E.2d 710 (1984); Justus v. State, 247 Ga. 276, 276 S.E.2d 242 (1981); Thomas v. State, 247 Ga. 233, 275 S.E.2d 318 (1981). 1. OCGA § 17-10-30(b)(2), 2. The crimes occurred on April 10, 1992. Pruitt was indicted on March 3, 1995, and the State f......
-
State v. Ramseur
...of mind," the Georgia court has found that age and physical characteristics of the victim may be considered, see Thomas v. State, 247 Ga. 233, 275 S.E.2d 318 (1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 973, 101 S.Ct. 3127, 69 L.Ed.2d 984 (1981), as well as the intent to inflict psychological distress on......
-
Rhode v. State
...child that was committed in Rhode's presence, and despite the large number of gunshots required to kill the child. See Thomas v. State, 247 Ga. 233, 275 S.E.2d 318 (1981). Constitutional 17. Rhode filed a motion to have execution by electrocution declared unconstitutional, but no evidence w......