Thompson Cadillac-Oldsmobile Inc. v. Silk Hope Automotive, Inc., CADILLAC-OLDSMOBILE
| Decision Date | 03 February 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 653P87,CADILLAC-OLDSMOBILE,653P87 |
| Citation | 321 N.C. 480,364 S.E.2d 672 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | THOMPSONINC. v. SILK HOPE AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Clinton McLaurin, Howard C. McLaurin, Shelby C. McLaurin, D. Wayne Hood, d/b/a Hood's Used Cars, Columbus County Auto Auction, Inc., George Turner, R.E. Dowdy, William S. Hiatt. |
Ragsdale & Kirschbaum, Raleigh, for plaintiff.
Jane P. Gray, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., and Victor H.E. Morgan, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for defendants Hiatt & Dowdy.
Williamson & Walton, Whiteville, for defendant Columbus County Auto.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. § 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 1988."
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
Epps v. Duke University, Inc.
...a claim against [the public officer].... Thompson, 87 N.C.App. 467, 469-70, 361 S.E.2d 418, 420 (1987), disc. review denied, 321 N.C. 480, 364 S.E.2d 672 (1988). The qualitative difference between the "mere negligence" language used in Hare, and the more illuminative but similar language in......
-
Murray v. Justice
...Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Silk Hope Automobile, Inc., 87 N.C.App. 467, 471, 361 S.E.2d 418, 421, disc. rev. denied, 321 N.C. 480, 364 S.E.2d 672 (1988). The Division of Motor Vehicles is a duly authorized state agency that is administered by the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles under the a......
-
Slade v. Vernon
...Thompson Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Silk Hope Automobile, Inc., 87 N.C.App. 467, 361 S.E.2d 418 (1987), disc. rev. denied, 321 N.C. 480, 364 S.E.2d 672 (1988). Here, plaintiffs have alleged defendants were negligent in their failure to supervise plaintiff in the course of their duties, wh......
-
Paschal v. Myers
...Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Silk Hope Automobile, Inc., 87 N.C.App. 467, 469, 361 S.E.2d 418, 420 (1987), disc. rev. denied, 321 N.C. 480, 364 S.E.2d 672 (1988). The facts fail to show any actions of the magnitude to pierce the cloak of official immunity, so as to allow defendants Myers an......
Request a trial to view additional results