Thompson's Estate, In re
Citation | 164 N.W.2d 141 |
Decision Date | 14 January 1969 |
Docket Number | No. 53315,53315 |
Parties | In the Matter of the ESTATE of Charles F. THOMPSON, Deceased. In the Matter of the ESTATE of Dorothy E. THOMPSON, Deceased. W. E. S. Hutcheon and John M. Shanda, Executors. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Eugene R. Melson, Jefferson, for appellant.
Cudahy & Wilcox, Jefferson, for appellees.
This is a proceeding in probate upon the application of certain beneficiaries asking that designated real estate be set off to them under the last will and testament of Charles F. and Dorothy E. Thompson. The application was resisted by the residual devisee, Presbyterian Church. Pursuant to hearing, the court granted applicants the relief prayed and resister appeals. The principal issue is the correctness of the court's construction of paragraph II--D of decedents' will.
Decedents Charles F. and Dorothy E. Thompson executed a joint last will and testament on February 6, 1960. Paragraph II--D provides in part: 'We also devise to the said Henry Ostendorf and Shirley Ostendorf, or the survivor thereof, the life use of the following described real estate, to-wit: The North fractional Half (N fr 1/2) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section Five (5), Township Eighty-two (82) North, Range Thirty (30), West of the 5th P.M., Greene County, Iowa, together with forty acres (40A) of our interest in the South Half (S 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4), and the West Half (W 1/2) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4), all in Section Thirty-two (32), Township Eighty-three (83) North, Range Thirty (30) West of the 5th P.M., Greene County, Iowa, and subject to said life use to Henry Ostendorf and Shirley Ostendorf, we devise the remainder of said real estate to said Richard Ostendorf upon condition that he pay the sum of $5,000.00 without interest to the Presbyterian Church of Jefferson, Iowa within two (2) years from the death of the survivor of Charles F. Thompson and Dorothy E. Thompson.'
In their application for admeasurement of their interest by the executors of this will duly admitted to probate, Henry, Shirley and Richard asked that the life use of 40 acres referred to in the will be taken from decedents' interest in the South Half (S 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 32, and a life use of decedents' interest in the 80 acres described as the West Half (W 1/2) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) be set off to Henry and Shirley Ostendorf, and on the condition that Richard pay the Presbyterian Church $5,000.00, the remainder to him. In other words, applicants claim the bequest was a life estate with conditional remainder in and to three parcels--the home 80 acres, 40 acres in the S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 32, and all 80 acres of the W 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 32.
In its resistance to the Ostendorf application the church claimed a vested interest in all but 40 acres of the testators' interest in all the described real estate in Section 32. In other words, the church contends, under the plain wording of the will, only 40 acres of the 160 acres described in Section 32 were given to the Ostendorfs, and the balance of testators' interest therein was given to the church as the residual beneficiary.
The following rough sketch of the tracts of land involved in this controversy may aid in understanding the area and location of this property:
NOTE: OPINION CONTAINS TABLE OR OTHER DATA THAT IS NOT VIEWABLE
Paragraph I of this will devised the personal property and the life use of all real estate to the surviving testator.
Paragraph II of the will provided:
'The surviving testator of this Will, either Charles F. Thompson or Dorothy E Thompson, as the case may be, hereby devises and bequeaths by this Will, all property owned by the surviving testator, and the real estate of the other testator, in the following manner:
Paragraph III provided for the appointment of executors of the will.
Pursuant to hearing to determine the intent of the testators under paragraph II--D, the trial court found the will was not ambiguous, construed the words used in applicants' favor, and directed the executors of the estate 'to surrender any possession which they have in and to the real estate described in paragraph II--D and that possession of the property in its entirety be set off to the applicants and that the applicants and the resistor determine, which they have agreed to do, which 40 acres the applicants shall receive as their devise.' It further sustained the applicants' motion for summary judgment for the purpose of settling title and interest in this real estate.
In its propositions relied on for reversal appellant asserts: (1) a decedent's will should be construed to carry out the intent of testator; (2) a will speaks as of the date of death, but is interpreted as of the date of its execution, and after-acquired property will pass only if intent is clear and explicit; (3) decedents' will...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Staab's Estate, In re
...plain and certain, the intention of the testator must be ascertained from the will itself and nothing else. In re Estate of Thompson, Iowa, 164 N.W.2d 141, 146. In re Estate of Artz, 254 Iowa 1064, 1070, 120 N.W.2d 418, 422; In re Estate of Zang, 255 Iowa 736, 739, 123 N.W.2d 883, 885. Extr......
-
Miguet's Estate, In re
...Luke, 184 N.W.2d 42 (Iowa), opinion filed February 9, 1971; In re Estate of Sheimo, 261 Iowa 775, 778, 156 N.W.2d 681; In re Estate of Thompson, 164 N.W.2d 141, 146 (Iowa). Finally, on this subject, our review is confined to those propositions properly assigned and argued. In re Estate of M......
-
Lemke's Estate, In re
...in Code § 633.33. Therefore our review is de novo. See In re Estate of Cory, 184 N.W.2d 693, 695--696 (Iowa 1971); In re Estate of Thompson, 164 N.W.2d 141, 146 (Iowa 1969); In re Will of Faber, 259 Iowa 1, 3, 141 N.W.2d 554 (1966); Iowa R.Civ.P. Weight is accorded trial court's findings bu......
-
Kraft's Estate, In re
...to only if the will is clearly ambiguous, conflicting, or testator's intent is for any reason uncertain.' See also In re Estate of Thompson, 164 N.W.2d 141, 146 (Iowa). V. The first question posed is whether the phrase 'subject to the foregoing' as employed in paragraph 4 of decedent's will......