Thompson v. Cumb. Telp. & Telg. Co.
Decision Date | 29 April 1910 |
Parties | Thompson v. Cumb. Telp. & Telg. Co. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, First Division).
WM. H. FIELD, Judge.
From a judgment of dismissal plaintiff appeals. — Affirmed.
POPHAM, WEBSTER & TRUSTY, KOHN, BAIRD, SLOSS & KOHN and ALBERT NESBIT for appellant.
FAIRLEIGH, STRAUS & FARLEIGH and NICHOLAS H. DOSKER for appellee.
Suing by his next friend, Donald Thompson, an infant four years of age, brought this action against the Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Company for damages for personal injury. The demurrer of the Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Company was sustained to the original petition, and to each of the amendments thereto, including an amended and substituted petition. Having declined to plead further, the petition was dismissed. From that judgment this appeal was prosecuted.
Omitting those matters which it is unnecessary to set forth, the petition is as follows:
Afterwards the petition was amended as follows: "Comes plaintiff, by counsel, and for amendment to his original petition herein says that the danger of which he complains in his original petition consisted in the exposure of the strands on the cable; that his hand was caught in the wire by playing around and upon the lowest step of the telephone pole complained of, by reaching his hand out and placing it near the exposed strands on the cable, and by stepping off from the lowest step on said pole to the sidewalk; that in thus stepping off his finger caught between the strands of wire and was jerked off and held in the cable."
The amended and substituted petition is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Young's Adm'r v. Mahan-Jellico Coal Co.
... ... to demonstrate that the appellant has no cause of action ... Thompson v. Cumberland Tel. & Teleg. Co., 138 Ky ... 109, 127 S.W. 531; Hermes' ... ...
-
Young's Adm'R v. Mahan-Jellico Coal Co.
...the facts of this case, it would seem, is sufficient to demonstrate that the appellant has no cause of action. Thompson v. Cumberland Tel. & Teleg. Co., 138 Ky. 109, 127 S.W. 531; Hermes' Adm'r v. Hatfield Coal Co., 134 Ky. 300, 120 S.W. 351, 23 L. R.A. (N.S.) 724; Mayfield Water & Light Co......