Thompson v. Flint & P.M.R. Co.

Decision Date10 June 1885
Citation57 Mich. 300,23 N.W. 820
PartiesTHOMPSON v. FLINT & P.M.R. CO.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

Error to Genesee.

Long & Gold, for plaintiff.

Wm. L. Webber, for defendant and appellant.

CHAMPLIN, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff by reason of the alleged negligence of defendant in not keeping a railroad crossing in repair. On the twenty-first of July, 1884, defendant caused its track to be repaired and raised at a crossing of a highway known as the "Tupper Crossing," on what is called the "Old Turnpike," between the village of Grand Blanc and the city of Flint, in the township of Grand Blanc Genesee county. The repair was made necessary on account of a depression in the track at that place, and the work consisted of raising the ties and rails, and placing ballast beneath raising the track some four or five inches immediately at the crossing, and gradually less in each direction. The work was done by the section men under the personal supervision of the section boss, Frank Dunn. They began in the morning at a point about 10 rods south of the crossing, and raised the track until they reached the crossing, and then tore up the plank and raised the crossing. They also raised the track for a distance of about 40-feet north of the crossing. The direction of the railroad track at the crossing was about N 22 deg. W., and that of the "Old Turnpike" about N 40 deg. W., making the angle at the crossing quite acute.

Shortly after 10 o'clock in the forenoon, the plaintiff, who lived in the township of Grand Blanc, drove up from the south to the crossing, with a horse attached to a light single buggy, on his way over the "Old Turnpike" to the city of Flint. At that time (according to his testimony) he found five or six men at work on the crossing. The planks were taken up and the men had a long lever under the rails raising the track. In order to loosen the ties, the dirt near them had been removed and thrown outside the rails into the highway. The plaintiff got out of his buggy, and led his horse safely over the track, and went on to Flint, about seven miles north. After transacting his business at Flint, the plaintiff started back to Grand Blanc shortly after 1 o'clock in the afternoon, and drove directly back the same way in which he came, arriving at the crossing in question about 2 o'clock. At that time (as he says in his testimony) he found the men tamping the ties which had been raised north of the crossing. The planks of the crossing were still removed, and the rails and ties were raised two or three inches more than they were when he crossed before, making them about three or four inches above the natural surface of the road-bed, and leaving the ties out of the ground, or exposed, about half of the tie. Only a portion of the dirt had been replaced under the ties, and the tops of the rails were about seven or eight inches above the top of the dirt inside the rails, and the dirt was a little lower on the outside.

The plaintiff on his cross-examination testified as follows: "The mare is rather of a nervous temperament--quick. I considered her entirely manageable.

"Question. Was she hard-bitted? Answer. Well, I had considered her so previous to that time, or about that time. I was about four rods from the railroad track when I got out of the buggy; I began to descend the grade in the road. I got out because I knew from experience that vehicles were liable to slide on those rails. I have been turned over on that crossing with the planks in, several years before, and that is the reason I got out and led my horse over. On my way home I did not speak to Frank Dunn or any of the men until after the accident. I saw them before I got out of the buggy. They were near enough, so I could have called them. I did not call Frank and ask him to put in some plank so I could get over, because I didn't consider it was necessary. I asked him in the morning if I could get over there with safety, and he told me he thought I could. Others had crossed. I had my own experience going down to guide me coming back. Coming to Flint, I went over substantially the same angle that I crossed going back, as near as may be. The wheels did not slide when I was coming towards Flint.

"Q. Then when you first got out of your buggy, as I understand, back about four rods from the track with your right hand behind the chin of the horse, or behind the lower jaw of the horse, you took both reins in your right hand and walked forward, leading your horse? A. I think I did. I think--I am sure I did hold.

"Q. Your left hand hanging loose at the time? A. Yes, sir. I walked down to the rail at a natural walk. When I came so that my wheels were about to strike the rail I turned and looked back to see how they were going to strike. I still had hold with my right hand. When I looked back to see how the wheels were going to strike, the forward wheels cleared the west rail all right. I could not say whether the hind wheels had got over before the forward wheels struck the next rail. I could not tell the position of the hind wheels, but I saw the front wheels between the rails. I did not see the front wheels when they struck the second rail. I was looking directly at the mare at that time. She had not appeared to be frightened or nervous at all up to this time. She was clear of the rail at that time. I don't know that I could swear positively whether it was the hind wheel or the front wheel that slid, but from the position of the shaft against my side, and the sound, I should say it was the forward wheel. I had no time then to turn. In fact, I could not look back after she made the first spring.

"Q. When the wheels slid on the rail it made a creaking or squealing sound? A. Yes, sir; a grating.

"Q. Sharp sound? A. Yes, sir. Like the rubbing of one piece of metal on another.

"Q. It was that sound that frightened the mare? A. That, together with the shaft striking her flank--the shafts or thills striking her flank.

"Q. If she had been going pretty slowly over there, the shaft could not have struck her flank with any particular force? A. It would have made a pretty good pressure against her side. The shafts did not come against her so when the wheels crossed the first rail, because the wheels did not slide there. It was the sliding that brought the shaft against her. I held up my speed in crossing over the rail. I recollect distinctly of holding up as the forward wheel struck the first rail, but whether I had increased in speed before I struck the other rail, I cannot say.

"Q. Didn't you hold your horse back, so that as the wheels struck the rail it would rise slowly over it and come down slowly, without coming down with a ca-chunk? A. I didn't think of that point. My object--I held up a little as it struck the first rail, to prevent the sliding.

"Q. And then it didn't occur to you as to the second rail as it had at the first? A. No, sir. As I got the horse over I remember of thinking that I was safe. When the wheels slid and the noise was made the horse jumped; she jumped a little sideways from me. I still held on with my right hand. The first spring she made I grabbed with both hands, but soon after had to let go with one hand to keep my position. I found I could not keep my feet, and I put one arm over her neck--that was my right arm. I did not do it at that time with a view of throwing myself onto her back. I did that to keep my feet and keep from being thrown down. I did not have hold of her mane; I had my arm over her neck. She is a low mare. I made a desperate attempt to stop her, and found that I was not gaining or succeeding in stopping her--was not checking her speed--and I then attempted to get upon her back, and I found that I could not do that; and as I came down I struck the ground with my feet, and made a desperate effort by throwing my feet ahead as far as possible to check her; and at the same time I calculated if I didn't check her that I had got to fall, and would throw my head clear of the wheels. If I had let go of her when she first jumped she would have cleared me, but the buggy would not. That was my first thought after the first spring.

"Q. When she sprang a little from you, if you had made one step backwards, away from the road, don't you think you would have cleared the buggy? A. I should not want to chance it. I did not figure out the position of the buggy at that time to see whether it was sliding towards me or away from me. I know now that it did certainly slide from me. I was on the left-hand side of the horse. At the time of the slide, I had hold of both bits with my right hand. Let me state one thing that I supposed the buggy was turned over at that time, from the sound and the position of the shafts--from the feeling to me of the shafts as they slid against her body. I supposed the buggy was tipped over towards me or towards the left-hand side, which would have been the case had it tipped over there. I was going south-east towards the village. The road was at such an angle with the rails that it slid towards the village; and in tipping...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT