Thompson v. National Bank of Commerce

Decision Date29 June 1908
Citation110 S.W. 681,132 Mo. App. 225
PartiesTHOMPSON v. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE et al.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; John G. Park, Judge.

Action by Theodore R. Thompson against the National Bank of Commerce and another, in which the other defendant intervened and was made a party defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded.

Johnson & Lucas and Elijah Robinson, for appellants. Sebree, Conrad & Wendorff, for respondent.

ELLISON, J.

This action was instituted to recover of the defendant bank the amount of a check given to plaintiff by defendants Houston, Fible & Co. Houston, Fible & Co. were not made parties by the plaintiff. After action was instituted, they came into court by motion, and on their showing they were made defendants by the court. They then filed an answer. They then asked that the case be transferred to the equity docket, and that it be heard as an equity case. These requests were refused by the court. A trial was then had before a jury, when a verdict was returned for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered. The answer set up: That defendants were a brokerage company who sold stocks, etc., on commission; that plaintiff employed them to sell for him 30 shares of stock in the American Ice Company, and delivered the stock to them for that purpose with his blank indorsement; that they attempted to sell the stock in New York through their correspondent there, and supposed they had done so at the price of $34.25 per share,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Babcock v. Rieger
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 21, 1933
    ...v. Lee, 193 Mo.App. 542; Chilton v. Chilton, 297 S.W. 459; Boehne v. Roth, 280 S.W. 731; Stalter v. Stalter, 151 Mo.App. 66; Thompson v. Bank, 132 Mo.App. 227; Rand McNally & Co. v. Wickhan, 60 Mo.App. Moore v. Mansfield, 286 S.W. 354; Green v. Conrad, 114 Mo. 651; Bondurant v. Mills, 294 S......
  • Hubbard v. Slavens
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 25, 1909
    ...the cause continued at law, and plaintiffs were entitled to a jury. Kerstner v. Vorweg, 130 Mo. 196, 32 S. W. 298; Thompson v. Bank, 132 Mo. App., loc. cit. 228, 110 S. W. 681. Is there substance in the assignment of error? We think not. This, (1) It is argued that matter constituting equit......
  • Newbrough v. Moore
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 29, 1918
    ...constitutes the right. Such a case is one for equitable interposition." This is the well-settled doctrine in Missouri. Thompson v. Bank, 132 Mo. App. 225, 110 S. W. 681; Kerstner v. Vorweg, 130 Mo. 196, 32 S. W. 298; Carter v. Prior, 78 Mo. 222; Hubbard v. Slavens, 218 Mo. loc. cit. 619, 11......
  • Jones v. Miners & Merchants Bank
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 4, 1910
    ... ... that he can make himself whole. Third National Bank v ... Allen, 59 Mo. 316; Kenneth Inv. Co. v. Bank, ... 103 Mo.App. 613; Kelchner v. Morris, ... [Lisle v. Shinnebarger, 17 Mo.App ... 66; Dobson v. Winner, 26 Mo.App. 329; Thompson ... v. The Bank, 132 Mo.App. 225, 110 S.W. 681; Koontz ... v. Central National Bank, 51 Mo. 275; ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT