Thompson v. North Texas Nat. Bank
Decision Date | 15 April 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 1438-5653.,1438-5653. |
Citation | 37 S.W.2d 735 |
Parties | THOMPSON et al. v. NORTH TEXAS NAT. BANK. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Worsham, Rollins, Burford, Ryburn & Hincks, Saner, Saner & Jack, and I. M. Williams, all of Dallas, and Tom Whipple, of Waxahachie, for plaintiffs in error.
Thomas, Storey & Grady, of Dallas, for defendant in error.
This suit was begun in the district court of Dallas county by North Texas National Bank against D. G. Thompson, R. K. Erwin, I. M. Williams, Mrs. Ella K. Gibson, and W. J. Rutledge, trustee in bankruptcy of Texas Mortgage Company, a corporation. Later Rutledge, trustee, was dismissed. The case was tried with a jury, but at the conclusion of the evidence the court peremptorily instructed a verdict in favor of D. G. Thompson, Mrs. Ella K. Gibson, and I. M. Williams. The court also peremptorily instructed a verdict in favor of the bank against R. K. Erwin. The jury returned a verdict as instructed, and judgment was entered accordingly. The reason for the instructed verdict against Erwin does not concern us, as he did not appeal therefrom. The North Texas National Bank appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals at Dallas, which court originally reversed the judgment of the district court in favor of Thompson, Mrs. Gibson, and Williams, and rendered judgment against them for the bank, but on rehearing this judgment was changed so as to remand the cause for a new trial. 23 S.W.(2d) 494. The case is in the Supreme Court on writ of error granted on application of Thompson, Mrs. Gibson, and Williams.
It appears from the record that on July 29, 1921, T. J. Cole, I. M. Williams, D. G. Thompson, R. K. Erwin, and Mrs. Ella K. Gibson, all stockholders and directors of Texas Mortgage Company, executed and delivered to the Southwest National Bank of Dallas, Tex., the following instrument of guaranty.
After the execution and delivery of the above instrument of guaranty, the mortgage company became indebted to the Southwest National Bank in the sum of $4,000, evidenced by a negotiable promissory note. This note was an asset of such bank and unpaid on May 13, 1925. On or about this last-named date the Southwest National Bank and North Texas National Bank entered into the following written contract:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Safer v. Perper, s. 75-1576 and 75-1577
...of purely contractual successorship. 15 Van Deusen v. Ruth, 343 Mo. 1096, 1103, 125 S.W.2d 1, 4 (1938); Thompson v. North Texas National Bank, 37 S.W.2d 735, 739 (Tex.Com.App.1931); see Hand v. Evans Marble Co., 88 Md. at 229-31, 40 A. at In the non-labor contractual cases, "successor" has ......
-
TYCO Valves & Controls, L.P. v. Colorado
...has long been associated with the entity that succeeds to the property and corporate rights of a corporation. See Thompson v. N. Tex. Nat'l Bank, 37 S.W.2d 735, 739 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1931, holding approved). A “successor corporation” is normally used in respect to “corporations becoming inv......
-
Van Deusen v. Ruth
...172 Mich. 457, 138 N.W. 330; Ferrell v. Deverick, 85 West Va. 1, 100 S.E. 850; Southworth v. Perring, 71 Kan. 755, 81 P. 481; Thompson v. North Texas, 37 S.W.2d 735; States v. Commonwealth Title Ins. Co., 193 U.S. 651, 48 L.Ed. 830. Westhues, C. Cooley and Bohling, CC., concur. OPINION WEST......
-
Ashcraft v. Lookadoo
...promise or agreement of guaranty manifest the intention that the right or rights created shall not be assigned. See Thompson v. North Tex. Nat'l Bank, 37 S.W.2d 735, 738-39 (Tex. Comm'n App.1931, holding approved); Lexington Ins. Co. v. Gray, 775 S.W.2d 679, 682 (Tex.App.--Austin 1989, writ......