Thompson v. State
| Decision Date | 02 June 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. S08A0854.,S08A0854. |
| Citation | 283 Ga. 581,662 S.E.2d 124 |
| Parties | THOMPSON v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Gerard B. Kleinrock, Decatur, for appellant.
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, Dist. Atty., Barbara B. Conroy, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Jason C. Fisher, Reggie A. Lampkin, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Marvin Thompson was convicted of malice murder in the shooting death of Leigh Franklin Mason.1 On appeal, Thompson challenges an evidentiary ruling of the trial court and asserts that the court improperly omitted a portion of the jury instruction on circumstantial evidence. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
Thompson admittedly shot and killed Mason, but claimed that he did so in self-defense after Mason approached him "face to face" and accused Thompson of stealing his money.2 An eyewitness testified that Thompson responded verbally to the accusation and then drew a revolver from his pocket and shot Mason once in the head. Although the eyewitness observed a knife in Mason's back pocket, Mason did not display the knife nor did he threaten Thompson with it. Thompson testified that although he saw Mason reach toward his back, he was not in a position to see Mason's back pocket; he never saw a weapon in Mason's possession; and he did not know that Mason was carrying a knife that night. Thompson also admitted that he could have retreated from the altercation. The responding officer observed a knife on the ground "somewhat underneath" the victim.
Thompson fled from the scene and concealed the gun. When he was arrested and taken into custody, he gave the investigating officers several conflicting statements. He ultimately admitted that he shot Mason and he led the officers to the weapon.
1. There was ample evidence for a rational trier of fact to have rejected Thompson's justification defense and to have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of malice murder. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). See also Murphy v. State, 279 Ga. 410(1), 614 S.E.2d 53 (2005).
2. Thompson submits that the trial court erred in granting the State's motion in limine, thereby precluding the defense from introducing evidence that Mason may have consumed cocaine in the hours preceding the shooting, and his general behavior when under the influence of cocaine.3
The defense proposed to introduce the evidence through the testimony of Kenny Butts, Mason's close friend who had shared his hotel room on the night of the shooting. The State's attorney suggested that Butts be questioned outside the presence of the jury to determine the substance of his testimony since the witness had given contradictory statements to counsel in pretrial interviews. The trial court, however, disallowed the proffer and granted the motion in limine, ruling that any evidence of cocaine consumption is irrelevant to the issues on trial, and even if relevant, any probative value is outweighed by its prejudicial effect.
Even assuming arguendo that Butts' testimony would have supported Thompson's claims, see generally Bell v. State, 280 Ga. 562, 566(4), 629 S.E.2d 213 (2006), we conclude that any error in disallowing that evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. See Felder v. State, 266 Ga. 574(2), 468 S.E.2d 769 (1996) ().
3. Finally, we reject Thompson's assertion that the trial court erred in refusing to give his requested jury instruction in the language of OCGA § 24-4-6.4 Thompson's "admission to having shot the victim, but claiming self-defense, removes this case from the rule that a conviction based entirely on circumstantial evidence can be affirmed only if every reasonable hypothesis other than guilt is excluded." (Emphasis supplied.) Murphy, supra at 410, fn. 3, 614 S.E.2d 53.5 In addition, Thompson's claim of self-defense was contradicted by his own...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Shaw v. State
...99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). See also Webb v. State, 284 Ga. 122, 123(1), 663 S.E.2d 690 (2008); Thompson v. State, 283 Ga. 581, 581(1), 662 S.E.2d 124 (2008). 2. Shaw asserts that the trial court erred when it failed to charge the jury that one acting in defense of self has no dut......
-
Evans v. the State.
...Henderson then screamed, “Tic shot my brother.” Thus, the statutory language of OCGA § 24–4–6 was not required. See Thompson v. State, 283 Ga. 581, 582(3), 662 S.E.2d 124 (2008) (no error where trial court did not give a requested jury instruction in the language of OCGA § 24–4–6 where the ......
-
Walker v. Flowers
...and gave a full instruction on reasonable doubt. See Evans v. State, 288 Ga. 571, 576, 707 S.E.2d 353 (2011) ; Thompson v. State, 283 Ga. 581, 582, 662 S.E.2d 124 (2008).Case No. S14A0883 (Flowers v. State) 3. Flowers argues first that the trial court erred in denying her motion to exclude ......
-
Crawford v. State
...have been given, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt.” (Citation omitted.) Thompson v. State, 283 Ga. 581, 582(3), 662 S.E.2d 124 (2008). 5. Crawford contends that the trial court, in its aggravated assault jury charge and recharge in response to a question......