Thompson v. State

Decision Date08 October 1987
Docket NumberNo. 44743,44743
Citation361 S.E.2d 154,257 Ga. 481
PartiesTHOMPSON v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Henry G. Bozeman, Dublin, for Rooney S. Thompson.

Beverly B. Hayes, Jr., Dist. Atty., Samuel A. Hilbun, Edwin J. Wilson, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dublin, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Dennis R. Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

WELTNER, Justice.

Rooney Thompson shot and killed Richard Jenkins with a handgun. He was convicted of malice murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. 1

1. The record contains a full account of hostility between Thompson and the victim, arising from Thompson's relationship with the victim's sister. On one occasion, the two men exchanged gunfire. Shortly before the killing, Thompson was heard to say "[T]his is not over with yet ... 'cause I'm going to get him 'cause he ain't got no business hitting me with that iron pipe ... I'm going down here and I'm going to kill him."

2. On the night of the killing, Thompson approached the victim at a tavern, and gunfire erupted. Thompson pursued the victim, firing his handgun. The victim ran and returned the fire. Jenkins died from a wound to the back. Thompson was shot in the chest. Thompson testified that the victim fired first. One witness testified that Thompson first brandished his handgun. Others testified they did not know which of the two men was the aggressor.

3. Thompson contends the trial court erred in not granting his motion for a directed verdict of not guilty, and in refusing to grant a new trial. He further contends the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not act in self-defense. From the evidence in the case, a rational trier of fact could have found Thompson guilty of malice murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

4. The trial court instructed the jury as to self-defense and voluntary manslaughter. Thompson contends the trial court erred in refusing to give his requested charge on involuntary manslaughter. His sole defense was justification. We observed in Saylors v. State, 251 Ga. 735, 737, 309 S.E.2d 796 (1983), that a "defendant who seeks to justify homicide under the 'self-defense' statute, OCGA § 16-3-21 ... is not entitled to an additional instruction on involuntary manslaughter in the course of a lawful act, (OCGA § 16-5-3(b) ... whatever the implement of death. For if he is justified in killing under OCGA § 16-3-21 ... he is guilty of no crime at all. If he is not so justified, the homicide does not fall within the 'lawful act' predicate of OCGA § 16-5-3(b) ... for the jury in rejecting his claim of justification, has of necessity determined thereby that the act is not lawful."

5. The trial court instructed the jury: "I charge you that evidence of prior difficulties between the defendant and the alleged victim has been admitted for your consideration solely and only for the purpose of illustrating, if it does so illustrate, the state of feelings between the defendant and the alleged victim and the bent of mind and course of conduct on the part of the accused. Now this evidence is admitted for your consideration only as it may illustrate such matters and for no other purpose. Whether this evidence illustrates such a matter is solely for you to determine, but you are not to consider such evidence for any other purpose." Thompson asserts that this charge prohibited the jury from considering the victim's alleged aggressive conduct toward Thompson, and from inferring a motive on the part of the victim to shoot...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Ellerbee v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 20, 1994
    ...language reaffirming that it is within the jury's discretion whether or not it will draw such an inference...." Thompson v. State, 257 Ga. 481, 483(6), 361 S.E.2d 154. Nevertheless, "[t]his error does not require reversal of the conviction under Count 2 (violation of OCGA § 40-6-391(a)(4)),......
  • Columbus v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 15, 1999
    ...State, 259 Ga. 778, 780(5), 387 S.E.2d 133 (1990); Johnson v. State, 259 Ga. 235, 236(3), 378 S.E.2d 859 (1989); Thompson v. State, 257 Ga. 481, 482(4), 361 S.E.2d 154 (1987); Saylors v. State, 251 Ga. 735(3), 309 S.E.2d 796 20. Davie v. State, 265 Ga. 800, 801(2), 463 S.E.2d 112 (1995). 21......
  • Harris v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 2, 2001
    ...Clark v. State, 265 Ga. 243, 246, 454 S.E.2d 492 (1995); Wood v. State, 258 Ga. 598(2), 373 S.E.2d 183 (1988); Thompson v. State, 257 Ga. 481(6), 361 S.E.2d 154 (1987). See also Mitchell v. State, 271 Ga. 242, 244(6), 516 S.E.2d 782 (1999). However, we admonished against the use of this cha......
  • Turner v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • October 7, 1996
    ...and unjustified use of a deadly weapon. See Lemay v. State, supra, 264 Ga. 263, 265, 443 S.E.2d 274 (1994); Thompson v. State, 257 Ga. 481(6), 361 S.E.2d 154 (1987). 5. Contrary to appellant's contention, his execution of an application for appointment of counsel did not constitute the invo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT