Thompson v. Thompson

Decision Date24 September 1902
Citation69 S.W. 714
PartiesTHOMPSON v. THOMPSON. [1]
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from circuit court.

"Not to be officially reported."

Action between E. T. Thompson and J. B. Thompson. From the judgment, E. T. Thompson appeals. Motion for rule. Denied.

E. L. England, for appellant.

C. S. Hill, for appellee.

DU RELLE, J.

Upon an award by arbitrators a judgment was entered in the circuit court by which appellee Agnes Thompson was adjudged entitled to the possession of a bay mare named Maud. An appeal was taken in the lower court, and supersedeas issued, but the appeal was dismissed, because not perfected in due time. A second appeal was sued out in the clerk's office of this court, and a new supersedeas issued, but before this was done an order of delivery was executed, and appellee obtained possession of the mare. Appellant now asks for a rule to restore the possession. The effect of the supersedeas is to preserve the status in quo pending the appeal. It cannot retroact. The condition of affairs which is presented is the condition at the time the supersedeas issued. It cannot undo what has been already done under the judgment. 2 Cyl. Law & Proc. p. 908, and cases there cited.

The motion is overruled.

---------

Notes:

[1] Reported by Edward W. Hines, Esq., of the Frankfort bar, and formerly state reporter.

---------

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Snow v. Duxstad
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 24 Marzo 1915
    ... ... ( Robinson v. Orr, 16 Oh. St. 287; Smith v ... Fisher, 32 Week. Law Bul. (Ohio) 394; McAlpin v ... Clark, 1 N. P. (Ohio) 195; Thompson v. Gest &c ... Assn., 13 Oh. Cir. Ct. 250; Heberger v ... Sabbert, 48 Week. Law Bul. 12; Charles v ... Fawley, 71 Ohio St. 50, 72 N.E ... ...
  • Bell Grocery Co. v. Booth
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • 20 Junio 1933
    ...upon the recovering plaintiff preserved the status of the parties as they existed at the time of their issuance. Thompson v. Thompson, 69 S.W. 714, 24 Ky. Law Rep. 645. And, after they were issued and served, no further steps could be taken under it. Weber v. Tanner, 64 S.W. 741, 23 Ky. Law......
  • Roberts v. Turk
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 12 Junio 1928
    ... ... A supersedeas ... is not retroactive and preserves only the status of affairs ... as they existed at the time it was issued. Thompson v ... Thompson, 69 S.W. 714, 24 Ky. Law Rep. 645. It is the ... supersedeas which suspends the judgment and forces it into ... abeyance, and not ... ...
  • Day & Congleton Lumber Co. v. Mack
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 24 Septiembre 1902
    ... ... the fact and time of filing. Insurance Co. v. Shrader ... (Tex. Sup.) 33 S.W. 112, 30 L.R.A. 498, 59 Am.St.Rep ... 25; Thompson v. Foster's Adm'r, 6 Ark. 208; ... Hook v. Fenner, 18 Colo. 283, 32 P. 614, 36 ... Am.St.Rep. 277; Franklin County Com'rs v. State, ... 24 Fla ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT