Thomson v. Bassett

Decision Date24 October 1940
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 24.
Citation36 F. Supp. 956
PartiesTHOMSON v. BASSETT, Deputy Com'r of United States Employees' Compensation Commission (COURTEAU et al., Interveners).
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan

Frost & Deo, of Escanaba, Mich., for plaintiff.

Joseph F. Deeb, U. S. Atty., of Grand Rapids, Mich., for defendant.

Yelland & Yelland, of Escanaba, Mich., and S. Eldridge Sampliner, of Cleveland, Ohio, for intervening defendants.

RAYMOND, District Judge.

The substantial issue presented arises out of plaintiff's claim that, for the reason that there was no competent evidence to support the award, the Deputy Commissioner was without jurisdiction. Plaintiff asserts that under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, compensation is payable for death of an employee only if death results from an injury occurring upon the navigable waters of the United States, see Title 33, U.S.C.A. § 903, and that the Deputy Commissioner had no jurisdiction because the proximate cause of death in the instant case took effect while deceased was on the fender of the dock, and therefore on land. The cases principally relied upon are: Smith & Son v. Taylor, 276 U. S. 179, 48 S.Ct. 228, 72 L.Ed. 520; Vancouver S. S. Co. v. Rice, 288 U.S. 445, 53 S.Ct. 420, 77 L.Ed. 885; and Minnie v. Port Huron Co., 295 U.S. 647, 55 S.Ct. 884, 79 L.Ed. 1631.

Review of the testimony is convincing that there is substantial evidence to support the finding of the Commissioner to the effect that the deceased employee caught one of the cables from the boat and started to walk with it along the fender (which was about 12 feet above the water) while the boat moved slowly into the dock; that while he was doing so, the cable became tight, causing him to be pulled from the fender; that he struck against the side of the boat and sank immediately; and that he was found dead a short time later, having sustained a fracture about the sixth cervical vertebra. The sole eyewitness of the accident who testified stated that deceased was pulled off the fender by the cable which was heavy and had "none too much slack". It is a fair inference therefrom that the accident and subsequent death resulted from the efforts of deceased to continue his hold upon the cable which was too heavy for him and was without sufficient slack.

The following excerpts from 1 Am.Jur., Admiralty, sections 43 and 46, concisely and correctly state the applicable rules of law:

"It is essential to the jurisdiction of admiralty over a cause involving a maritime tort that the wrong shall have been committed upon navigable waters within the jurisdiction of the Federal courts. In fact, it has frequently been said that the question of locality is the sole test of admiralty jurisdiction in tort cases.

"In determining whether a tort was committed on land or on water, consideration must be given to the place where the injury and damage arose, rather than to the place where the negligent act was committed or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Marine Stevedoring Corporation v. Oosting
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • June 20, 1968
    ...Beasley v. O'Hearne, 250 F.Supp. 49 (S.D. W.Va.1966); Gulf Oil Corp. v. O'Keeffe, 242 F.Supp. 881 (E.D.S.C.1965); Thomsen v. Bassett, 36 F.Supp. 956 (W.D. Mich.1940). These are the cases that justify the affirmance of the award in Marine Stevedoring Corp. v. Oosting. 9 Calbeck v. Travelers ......
  • Weinstein v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • April 26, 1963
    ...78 U.S. (11 Wall.) 1, 20 L.Ed. 90 (1870); Dean v. Chesapeake Bay Ferry District, 158 F.Supp. 408 (E.D.Va.1958); Thomson v. Bassett, 36 F.Supp. 956 (W.D. Mich.1940); Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. City of Monterey, 6 F.2d 893 (N.D. The respondents take the position that admiralty jurisdiction ov......
  • Michigan Mutual Liability Company v. Arrien
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 10, 1964
    ...over torts and the test of Longshoremen's Act coverage. E. g., Ford v. Parker, 52 F.Supp. 98 (D.Md. 1943); Thomson v. Bassett, 36 F.Supp. 956 (W.D.Mich. 1940). Such a distinction would be anomalous since it was the purpose of the Longshoremen's Act to provide a remedy throughout the area in......
  • Thibodeaux v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 19, 1960
    ...land or a land structure (dock) followed by substantial damage from contact with the vessel followed by drowning is Thomson v. Bassett, D.C.W.D.Mich.1940, 36 F.Supp. 956. This affirmed a death award under the Longshoremen's Act, where the worker, on walking on the fender of the dock was pul......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT