Thorne v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Stamford

Decision Date21 September 1966
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesJ. Stewart THORNE et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the CITY OF STAMFORD et al.

Francis J. McNamara, Jr., Stamford, in support of the motion.

The motion by the plaintiffs for a review of the decision concerning the correction of the record in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford is remanded to the trial court with direction that the trial judge hold a hearing on the plaintiffs' motion to correct the record and to add to the finding such claims of law, if any, as were properly made but were not included in the finding. See Practice Book § 223.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State v. Dukes
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • January 28, 1969
    ...v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 155 Conn. 236, 248, 230 A.2d 595; Rifkin v. Rifkin, 155 Conn. 7, 8, 229 A.2d 358; Thorne v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 154 Conn. 718, 222 A.2d 809. 'Claims of law, to receive consideration in this court, must have been raised in the court below. They may not for th......
  • Fink v. Cox
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • September 21, 1966

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT