Tibbetts v. Reynolds

Decision Date23 October 1923
Docket NumberCase Number: 11834
Citation1923 OK 852,223 P. 185,101 Okla. 119
PartiesTIBBETTS, Trustee, v. REYNOLDS et al.
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court
Syllabus

¶0 1. Taxation--Requisites of Tax Deeds--Invalidity.

Section 9746, Comp. Stat. 1921, relating to tax resale by the county, requires that the tax deed show a statement of the acts and proceedings had in making the sale and resale of the property, and under this statute the deed must set forth the acts and proceedings in connection with the tax sale and resale from which the court may determine that all legal requirements have been satisfied in order to constitute a deed valid upon its face; and, where the deed does not contain such statement, or contains only the legal conclusions of the officer executing the instrument in lieu of a statement of facts showing the performance of the acts required by the statute, the deed is void upon its face.

2. Same--Judgment--Affirmance.

Record examined, and held, that the judgment of the trial court sustaining demurrer to plaintiff's evidence should be affirmed.

Fred W. Green, for plaintiff in error.

H. M. Adams, for defendants in error.

COCHRAN, J.

¶1 This action was filed by the plaintiff in error to quiet title to certain real estate in the city of Guthrie. The plaintiff in error alleged that he was the owner of said property under a certain resale tax deed and that the defendants in error were claiming to be the owners of said property. A demurrer was sustained to the evidence of the plaintiff in error and judgment was rendered for the defendants in error. The defendants in error contend that the resale tax deed was void upon its face for the reason that said deed was not executed in compliance with section 9746, Comp. Stat. 1921, which requires the treasurer to prepare the deed setting out a summary of the matters and proceedings pertaining to the resale. In construing this statute, this court in Pierce v. Barrett, 93 Okla. 283, 220 P. 652, said:

"Nor are the requirements of section 9746, supra, satisfied by the county treasurer setting out in the deed his conclusions as to the regularity of the acts and proceedings resulting in the resale. The treasurer should set out the acts and proceedings in the deed relating to the tax sale and resale of the property, and leave to the court the duty of passing upon the sufficiency of the acts and proceedings to meet the requirements of the law for a valid tax deed. * * * In order for a tax deed to be valid on its face,
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Adams v. Lockridge Grain Co.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • September 16, 1924
    ... ... Pierce v. Barrett, 93 Okla. 283, 220 P. 652; Tibbetts v. Reynolds et al., 101 Okla. 119, 223 P. 185; Adams v. Mottley, 97 Okla. 230, 223 P. 356; Adams v. Heirs of McKinney, 98 Okla. 144, 224 P. 692.2 ... ...
  • Wolfe v. Brooke
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • May 29, 1928
    ...692, in support of their contention that the resale tax deed here involved is void upon its face. That case, as well as Tibbetts v. Reynolds, 101 Okla. 119, 223 P. 185; Pierce v. Barrett, 93 Okla. 283, 220 P. 652, and several others, did hold that a resale tax deed, which did not set forth ......
  • Treese v. Ferguson
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • October 27, 1925
    ...deed in the instant case was not void on its face because it contained said conclusion as to notice. ¶18 In Tibbetts, Trustee, v. Reynolds, 101 Okla. 119, 223 P. 185, it is held:"Section 9746, Comp. Stat. 1921, relating to tax resale by the county, requires that the tax deed show a statemen......
  • Cook v. Vincent
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • July 14, 1925
    ...223 P. 356; Adams v. Heirs of McKinney et al., 98 Okla. 144, 224 P. 692; Pierce v. Barrett, 93 Okla. 283, 220 P. 652; Tibbetts v. Reynolds, 101 Okla. 119, 223 P. 185; Adams v. Callander, 93 Okla. 228, 220 P. 344. ¶5 A reading of the foregoing cases construing this resale tax law will show t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT