Tietjen v. United Post offices Corporation
Decision Date | 22 June 1933 |
Citation | 19 Del.Ch. 343,167 A. 846 |
Court | Court of Chancery of Delaware |
Parties | GEORGE M. TIETJEN, v. UNITED POST OFFICES CORPORATION, a corporation of the State of Delaware |
BILL FOR RECEIVER on the ground of insolvency (Revised Code 1915 § 3883). The complainant alleges himself to be the holder of three thousand dollars of the five and one-half per cent. first mortgage bonds of the defendant. There are over four million dollars of such bonds outstanding. The interest due on them last February 15th was not paid and remains in default. The bill alleges that the defendant lacks funds with which to pay the interest and that it is insolvent. Six persons holding an aggregate of twenty-one thousand dollars of said bonds have intervened on the side of the complainant and a bondholders' committee representing one million five hundred and forty-three thousand dollars of said bonds has intervened on the side of the defendant in opposition to the bill.
The defendant has filed a plea in bar of the bill. The complainant has caused the plea to be set down for hearing upon its sufficiency in law.
Plea sustained.
John Biggs, Jr., for complainant.
Christopher L. Ward, Jr., of the firm of Marvel, Morford, Ward & Logan for defendant.
The plea sets up the defense that the complainant holds bonds which were issued under an indenture of mortgage whose terms are such as to forbid the maintenance of the pending bill. The plea sets out Section 1 of Article 7 of the indenture, which is as follows:
The plea then avers that the trustees have not received...
To continue reading
Request your trial