Tilton v. Tilton
Decision Date | 11 November 1908 |
Parties | Tilton v. Tilton |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Robertson Circuit Court.
Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. — Reversed.
ROBT. BUCKNER and JNO. P. McCARTNEY attorneys for appellant.
J. J. OSBORNE for appellees.
SAMUEL HOLMES and W. J. OSBORNE of counsel.
In 1875 Nimrod A. Tilton, a widower, and Nancy F. Morand, a widow, both residents of Robertson county, Ky., entered into the following contract: At the date of the execution of this contract Nimrod A. Tilton was living on a farm of some 160 or 170 acres with his four children, the oldest a boy some 17 or 18 years of age, the youngest a girl, possibly 8 or 9 years of age. His wife had died some three months before. Nancy F. Morand had been a widow for some three or four years. She had no children. She had lived in the home of Nimrod A. Tilton, commonly called "Judge" Tilton, for a year or more before the death of his wife, who was quite an invalid. During this time she had attended to the general household duties, in addition to doing the cooking and washing, on a salary of $1.50 per week. After the death of Mrs. Tilton she continued to live in his home and look after the household duties, etc., as she had done before. In the early part of September following she and Judge Tilton were married. They lived together on his farm from that time until his death in 1906. The marriage contract was recorded in the county court clerk's office in October following their marriage. He left a will by the terms of which he gave to his wife the household goods, kitchen furniture, and about $200 in money. By another clause of the will provision is made that, if it is contested, the devisee contesting forfeits all right to any portion of his estate. She renounced the will, and filed a suit in the Robertson circuit court, in which she sought to have canceled and set aside the ante-nuptial contract above set out, on the ground that it was obtained from her through fraud and misrepresentation, and that it was unjust, inequitable, and a fraud upon her rights as a married woman. She asked that she be adjudged the owner of a widow's share in her husband's estate. Issue was joined upon the allegations of the petition, much proof taken, and upon final hearing the chancellor found against her contention, and dismissed her petition. From that finding and judgment she prosecutes this appeal.
Most all of the proof that has been taken relates to the home life of Judge Tilton, especially during the last few years thereof, when he was sick, afflicted with a cancer, and a good part of the time confined to his bed, almost helpless. Further than to show the devoted, untiring, and constant service which Mrs. Tilton rendered her husband in his sad affliction, this evidence has little bearing on the question before us. Mrs. Tilton and Dr. M. S. Brown are the only witnesses who have testified concerning the execution of this marriage contract. The testimony of Mrs. Tilton, under the well-recognized rule, was incompetent, and the trial judge did not err in excluding it from his consideration. The question in issue must therefore be determined by the contract itself, as read in the light of the testimony of Dr. Brown. At the time of the execution of this contract Dr. Brown was engaged in the practice of law at Mt. Olivet, and Judge Kimbrough was associated with him. He testifies that Judge Tilton came to see him about the preparation of this contract, and talked about the matter over with him, and told him how he wanted it drawn; that he in turn discussed the matter with Judge Kimbrough, his law partner, and had Judge Kimbrough draw up the contract as it now is. After it was prepared, Judge Tilton came to town with Nancy F. Morand, and brought her to his (Brown's) room in the hotel, and there he (Brown) read over the contract to her, and explained it to her, and after this was done, it was signed by Judge Tilton and Nancy F. Morand in his presence. The clerk was caused to come to his room and take their acknowledgments. This done, Judge Tilton and Nancy F. Morand left, and returned to his home. Dr. Brown further testifies that he was at that time a friend of her family. That they were poor people, and he took an interest in her, and on this account was careful to see that she understood what she was doing. That both she and Judge Tilton were, at that time, being criticised in the neighborhood because of her staying at his house and taking care of his home and his children for him after the death of his wife, and in the course of his testimony he said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stratton v. Wilson
... ... prospective husband's estate and the value of her marital ... rights therein which she by its terms is surrendering." ... Tilton v. Tilton, 130 Ky. 281, 113 S.W. 134, 132 Am ... St. Rep. 359. Other cases in point are Daniels v ... Banister, 146 Ky. 48, 141 S.W. 393; ... ...
-
Weeks v. Weeks
... ... 691] To the same effect is Hessick v. Hessick, ... 169 Ill. 486, 48 N.E. 712. See also Warner v ... Warner, 235 Ill. 448, 85 N.E. 630; Tilton v ... Tilton, 130 Ky. 281, 113 S.W. 134, 132 Am.St.Rep. 359 ... In ... Mann v. Mann, 270 Ill. 83, 110 N.E. 345, 346, the reason ... ...
-
Mallow v. Eastes
...a construction most favorable to the wife. Deller v. Deller, 141 Wis. 255, 124 N. W. 278, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 751;Tilton v. Tilton, 130 Ky. 281, 113 S. W. 134, 132 Am. St. Rep. 359. Our courts have uniformly upheld antenuptial contracts where fairly entered into, even though the effect be t......
-
Welsh v. Welsh
...held in the cases cited and in cases from other jurisdictions, Fisher v. Koontz, 110 Iowa, 498, 80 N. W. 551;Tilton v. Tilton, 130 Ky. 281, 113 S. W. 134,132 Am. St. Rep. 359; 21 Cyc. 1250, to impose upon the husband the burden of showing, if he would sustain the contract, that there was no......