Tines v. Commonwealth
Decision Date | 11 December 1903 |
Citation | 77 S.W. 363 |
Parties | TINES v. COMMONWEALTH. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Graves County.
"Not to be officially reported."
Tom Tines was convicted of crime, and appeals. Reversed.
B. C Seay and Saml. H. Crossland, for appellant.
Clifton J. Pratt, for the Commonwealth.
The appellant, Tom Tines, was indicted by the grand jury of Graves county, charged with the offense of feloniously breaking into the warehouse of Will Ryburn, and taking and carrying away therefrom one set of buggy harness, the personal property of Ryburn. Upon trial he was convicted, and sentenced to one year in the penitentiary.
It was conclusively shown by the commonwealth that Ryburn's warehouse or barn was feloniously broken into, and his harness stolen therefrom, in July, 1901, and that about a year afterward the harness was found in the possession of one Hicks. The only evidence in any way tending to connect appellant, Tines, with the affair, is his own affidavit which the acting county attorney procured from him under the guise of using it as evidence against the unknown perpetrators of the crime. This affidavit is as follows ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Edwards
...Priest v. Indiana, 270 Ind. 449, 386 N.E.2d 686 (1979); People v. Hampton, 394 Mich. 437, 231 N.W.2d 654 (1975); and Tines v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W. 363 (Ky.1903).Several jurisdictions have adopted the approach which I recommend herein: that although giving the charge over a defendant's obje......
-
Marcum v. Com.
...29 S.W. 616, 16 Ky.Law Rep. 509; or to single out specific facts or groups of facts and give them undue importance, Tines v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W. 363, 25 Ky. Law Rep. 1233; Murphy v. Commonwealth, 205 Ky. 493, 266 S.W. 33; Urban v. Commonwealth, 196 Ky. 775, 245 S.W. 852. Other courts take......
-
Com. v. Buiel
...an instruction over the defendant's objection. See, e.g., Russell v. State, 240 Ark. 97, 99-100, 398 S.W.2d 213 (1966); Tines v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W. 363, 364 (Ky.1903); People v. Hampton, 394 Mich. 437, 231 N.W.2d 654 (1975). Other States have stated such a rule in dicta. See State v. Kim......
-
Griffin v. State of California, 202
...on Defendant's Failure to Take the Stand, 57 Yale L.J. 145. 9 See, e.g., State v. Pearce, 56 Minn., 226, 57 N.W. 652, 1065; Tines v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W. 363, 25 KyL.Rep. 1233; Hanks v. Commonwealth, 248 Ky. 203, 58 S.W.2d 394. 10 It should be noted that the defendant's counsel did not req......