Tinley v. Chambers Implement Co., 41251.
Decision Date | 20 June 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 41251.,41251. |
Citation | 216 Iowa 458,249 N.W. 390 |
Parties | TINLEY v. CHAMBERS IMPLEMENT CO. et al. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from District Court, Pottawattamie County; J. S. Dewell, Judge.
This is an action in damages for the death of John Powell resulting from an automobile collision between a car driven by him and a truck owned by the defendants and driven by one of their employees. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and a judgment was entered thereon. Defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
Superseding opinion, 243 N. W. 381.Kimball, Peterson, Smith & Peterson, A. G. Kistle, and H. C. Churchman, all of Council Bluffs, for appellants.
Tinley, Mitchell, Ross & Mitchell, of Council Bluffs, for appellee.
This case was originally before this court and a reversing opinion rendered in Tinley v. Chambers Implement Co. et al., 243 N. W. 381. A rehearing was granted and that opinion is hereby withdrawn.
The only question raised in this case is whether or not the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
The collision occurred after dark November 11, 1930, on highway No. 32, at or near the intersection of said highway with a private road entering thereon from the home of one Koester. Deceased left the Koester home at night and was driving to his own home some distance east on highway No. 32.
Highway No. 32 runs east and west and is 18 feet wide with a 5-foot shoulder on each side. The Koester home is about 233 feet north of highway No. 32 and the private drive therefrom to the highway runs north and south. At the south end of the driveway it spreads out in a fan shape at its junction with No. 32. The private driveway is generally about 15 feet wide, and 28 feet wide where it joins with No. 32.
The evidence shows that an automobile, traveling on any part of the private drive from the Koester home to the highway, is visible to persons on highway No. 32 for a distance of at least 1,000 feet east of the intersection. The headlights on both the car and the truck were lit. There was also a spotlight on the truck. The truck was traveling from 40 to 50 miles an hour. The deceased at the time he was driving his Ford coupé onto the paving was traveling about 5 miles an hour.
Appellants contend that the deceased drove his car onto the paving without stopping, came directly into the path of the on-coming truck, and was struck by the truck on the intersection while on the north side of the pavement. Appellants' contention is supported by the testimony of the driver of the truck and the testimony of a witness who was driving a car a few hundred feet behind the truck.
The deceased did not stop before entering the paving, but the appellee contends that he drove across to the south half of the paving, had turned his car easterly thereon, and was 40 or 50 feet east of the intersection at the time of the collision.
As a result of the collision the decedent's car landed north of the pavement and about 10 feet west of the Koester driveway. The truck stopped about 200 feet west of the driveway on the south side of the pavement. Powell's body was found about 60 feet west of the intersection with blood all around his head. One of the vital questions in the case was the location of the cars at the time of the impact. The witness Koester saw the collision from the window of the southeast bedroom of his home. He testified that he saw the deceased driving his car when he got almost on the highway. He testified ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mueller v. Roben
...for the court. Barnes v. Barnett, 184 Iowa 936, 169 N.W. 365; Altfilisch v. Wessel, 208 Iowa 361, 225 N.W. 862; Tinley v. Chambers Implement Co., 216 Iowa 458, 249 N.W. 390; Minks v. Stenberg, 217 Iowa 119, 250 N.W. 883; Orth v. Gregg, 217 Iowa 516, 250 N.W. 113; Rogers v. Jefferson, 224 Io......