Tocker v. City of New York

Decision Date13 October 2005
Docket Number6640N.
Citation2005 NY Slip Op 07581,802 N.Y.S.2d 147,22 A.D.3d 311
PartiesBARBARA TOCKER et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Indisputably, plaintiffs' acceptance of the settlement offer was communicated by their counsel to defendants' counsel in a telephone call. Accordingly, the agreement to settle the action was not "one made between counsel in open court" (CPLR 2104), and thus is not enforceable (Matter of Dolgin Eldert Corp., 31 NY2d 1, 4-5, 8-11 [1972]). The requirement that a settlement agreement be made in "open court" does more than advance the goal of eliminating disputes about the critical terms of the agreement. In addition, it serves a cautionary function by tending to ensure that acceptance is considered and deliberate (id. at 10 ["the formality, publicity, and solemnity of an open court proceeding marked it as different from the preliminary atmosphere attached to informal conferences elsewhere"]). Whatever indeterminacy there may be in the term "open court," that term cannot be construed to include a telephone call between counsel. Moreover, to recognize a telephone call between counsel as an "open court" proceeding would invite disputes about what was said and "would constitute but a precursor to renewed litigation" (id. at 11).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Powell v. Omnicom
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 7 Agosto 2007
    ...and to perform a "cautionary function" whereby the parties' acceptance is considered and deliberate, see Tocker v. City of N.Y., 22 A.D.3d 311, 802 N.Y.S.2d 147, 148 (2005). The in-court announcement here functioned in a manner akin to that of a memorializing writing. As a result, this fact......
  • People v. Henderson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 Octubre 2005
    ...22 A.D.3d 311 ... 804 N.Y.S.2d 288 ... 2005 NY Slip Op 07583 ... THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, ... RYNELL HENDERSON, Appellant ... Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT