Tom v. State ex rel. Tom
Decision Date | 06 July 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 2963,2963 |
Citation | 143 So.2d 226 |
Parties | Helen TOM, a/k/a Siu Fun Kwong Tom, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. Johnny TOM, a/k/a Jin Hon Tom, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James F. Snelling, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
C. Ray Smith, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
This is an appeal from an order entered in favor of the respondent-appellee in a habeas corpus proceeding.
Upon examining the record-on-appeal in the instant case, a question of this court's jurisdiction became apparent--a question which was raised by neither party herein. Questions of jurisdiction, however, may be noticed by the appellate court ex mero motu. In re Estate of O'Neal, Fla.App.1962, 142 So.2d 315; Casey v. Smith, Fla.App.1961, 134 So.2d 846; Florio v. State ex rel. Epperson, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 305, 80 A.L.R.2d 1117.
The notice of appeal filed in the instant case is directed to an order or judgment of the circuit court which, according to the certificate of the clerk of that court, was filed for record on January 2, 1962, although the judge signed it on December 12, 1961. The notice of appeal bears the certificate of the clerk of the lower court indicating that it was filed and recorded in his office on December 11, 1961.
Then, on December 14, 1961, counsel for the parties filed with the clerk below the following stipulation:
Rule 3.1 subd. b, Fla.App.Rules, 31, F.S.A., reads as follows:
'Appeals from final decisions, orders, judgments or decrees shall be commenced within 60 days from the rendition of the final decision, order, judgment or decree appealed from, unless some other period of time for taking an appeal is specifically provided by statute or these rules.'
The vital word 'rendition' is defined in Rule 1.3, Fla.App.Rules,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dewey v. Mynatt
...of a final judgment or decree cannot confer jurisdiction upon the court. Shaw v. Hill, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 721; Tom v. State ex rel. Tom, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 226. Where an appeal is taken in violation of the rules so that it is not legally sufficient to confer jurisdiction of the su......
-
Bumby & Stimpson, Inc. v. Peninsula Utilities Corp.
...of a final judgment or decree cannot confer jurisdiction upon the court. Shaw v. Hill, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 721; Tom v. State ex rel. Tom, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 226. Where an appeal is taken in violation of the rules so that it is not legally sufficient to confer jurisdiction of the su......
-
Tom v. State ex rel. Tom
...of the petitioner, and Helen Tom took an appeal to this Court. That appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tom v. State ex rel. Tom, Fla.App., 143 So.2d 226, decided July 6, On July 11, 1962, the North Carolina Court entered an order directing Helen Tom to have the children befo......
-
Flinchbaugh v. Florida Real Estate Commission
...without jurisdiction to grant such petition in this instance. Questions of jurisdiction may be noted ex mero motu. Tom v. State ex rel. Tom, Fla.App., 1962, 143 So.2d 226. Rule 4.5(c) of the Florida Appellate Rules effective after midnight September 30, 1962, 31 F.S.A. 1 requires an applica......