Tombollo v. Dunn, A-C

CourtSupreme Court of South Dakota
Writing for the CourtHENDERSON
Citation342 N.W.2d 23
Parties115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2827, 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,851 Sandi TOMBOLLO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Eugene H. DUNN, Individually and d/b/a Sioux Falls Rent-ar (Hertz); and Dennis E. Kjerstad, Defendants and Appellees. . Considered on Briefs
Decision Date01 December 1983
Docket NumberNo. 14196,A-C

Page 23

342 N.W.2d 23
115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2827, 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,851
Sandi TOMBOLLO, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Eugene H. DUNN, Individually and d/b/a Sioux Falls
Rent-A-Car (Hertz); and Dennis E. Kjerstad,
Defendants and Appellees.
No. 14196.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Considered on Briefs Dec. 1, 1983.
Decided Jan. 4, 1984.

Page 24

James E. McMahon of Boyce, Murphy, McDowell & Greenfield, Sioux Falls, for plaintiff and appellant.

Thomas E. Simmons of Bangs, McCullen, Butler, Foye & Simmons, Rapid City, for defendants and appellees.

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On February 23, 1982, appellant Sandi Tombollo (referred to as Tombollo for convenience) filed a sexual discrimination charge with the South Dakota Division of Human Rights (Commission) alleging Tombollo was terminated from employment at appellee Dunn's business for failure to have sexual relations with a manager, appellee Kjerstad. A Commission investigation ensued. Prior to a final Commission determination, Tombollo filed an action against appellees seeking damages for wrongful discharge of employment, invasion of privacy, and assault and battery. On October 29, 1982, Commission notified Tombollo that it had dismissed her charge and, if she wished, she could appeal the determination to a trial court pursuant to SDCL 1-26-30. Tombollo failed to appeal the determination.

Appellees filed a motion to dismiss with the trial court on December 2, 1982, and Dunn filed an affidavit on December 9, 1982, in support thereof. This motion to dismiss was treated as one for summary judgment. Tombollo responded with an affidavit and copy of Commission's investigation. On March 2, 1983, the trial court filed a detailed memorandum decision dismissing Tombollo's action. On March 8, 1983, summary judgment and an order were entered in favor of appellees. In the law suit proper, Count I was for wrongful termination and Count II was for invasion of privacy and assault and battery; Count II of the complaint was also dismissed as against appellee Dunn because there was no allegation that the alleged conduct of appellee Kjerstad as pleaded in Count II was within the course and scope of Kjerstad's

Page 25

employment with Dunn. After summary judgment, only Count II as against Kjerstad remained for trial. Tombollo filed her notice of appeal to this Court on May 4, 1983. We affirm.
FACTS

Tombollo became employed at Dunn's automobile rental firm in May of 1969. Kjerstad took...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Setliff v. Akins, No. 21023
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of South Dakota
    • September 6, 2000
    ...Inc., 472 N.W.2d 761, 762-63 (S.D.1991) (citing Hopes v. Black Hills Power & Light Co., 386 N.W.2d 490 (S.D. 1986); Tombollo v. Dunn, 342 N.W.2d 23 (S.D.1984)). See also Jane Wipf Pfeifle & Steven J. Helmers, The Evolving Boundaries of the At-Will Employment Doctrine in South Dakota: Defini......
  • Johnson v. Kolman, a Div. of Athey Products Corp., No. 15388
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of South Dakota
    • February 19, 1987
    ...from bringing an action in circuit court alleging wrongful discharge by his employer. 372 N.W.2d at 120. See also Tombollo v. Dunn, 342 N.W.2d 23 (S.D.1984), where this court ruled that the plaintiff was unable to bring an independent circuit court action premised upon her alleged wrongful ......
  • Larson v. Kreiser's, Inc., 16951
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of South Dakota
    • June 26, 1991
    ...will of the employer under SDCL 60-4-4. Hopes v. Black Hills Power and Light Co., 386 N.W.2d 490 Page 763 (S.D.1986); Tombollo v. Dunn, 342 N.W.2d 23 In Larson I, we held that an express or implied contract of employment may be created on the basis of an employer's oral representations, cit......
  • Breen v. Dakota Gear & Joint Co., Inc., No. 16107
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of South Dakota
    • October 14, 1988
    ...this issue, as Breen was an employee-at-will under our interpretation of SDCL 60-4-4 in Blote, 422 N.W.2d at 837, and Tombollo v. Dunn, 342 N.W.2d 23 Page 224 II. Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Breen's second argument is that South Dakota should imply a covenant of good fai......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT