Tomhannock, LLC v. Roustabout Res., LLC
Decision Date | 25 June 2019 |
Docket Number | No. 52,52 |
Citation | 128 N.E.3d 674,104 N.Y.S.3d 596,33 N.Y.3d 1080 |
Parties | TOMHANNOCK, LLC, Respondent, v. ROUSTABOUT RESOURCES, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendants. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Gilchrist Tingley, P.C., Troy (Andrew W. Gilchrist and Jonathon B. Tingley of counsel), for appellant.
The Spain Law Firm, PLLC, Troy (Thomas D. Spain of counsel), for respondent.
The Supreme Court order appealed from and the Appellate Division order brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs.
Interpreting a contract "is the process of determining from the words and other objective manifestations of the parties what must be done or forborne by the respective parties in order to confirm to the terms of their agreements" ( Williston on Contracts § 30:1 ). "The best evidence of what parties to a written agreement intend is what they say in their writing" ( Slamow v. Del Col, 79 N.Y.2d 1016, 1018, 584 N.Y.S.2d 424, 594 N.E.2d 918 [1992] ). Under longstanding rules of contract interpretation, "[w]here the terms of a contract are clear and unambiguous, the intent of the parties must be found within the four corners of the contract, giving a practical interpretation to the language employed and reading the contract as a whole" ( Ellington v. EMI Music, Inc., 24 N.Y.3d 239, 244, 997 N.Y.S.2d 339, 21 N.E.3d 1000 [2014], citing Greenfield v. Philles Records, 98 N.Y.2d 562, 569, 750 N.Y.S.2d 565, 780 N.E.2d 166 [2002] ; W.W.W. Assoc. v. Giancontieri, 77 N.Y.2d 157, 162–163, 565 N.Y.S.2d 440, 566 N.E.2d 639 [1990] ).
Tomhannock fulfilled the only precondition in the Agreement to the parcel's reconveyance when it made a timely written demand. Contrary to Roustabout's arguments, this was the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crescent Beach Club LLC v. Indian Harbor Ins. Co.
...Enters., LLC v. Marvel Characters, Inc. , 716 F.3d 302, 313 (2d Cir. 2013) ; see also Tomhannock, LLC v. Roustabout Res., LLC , 33 N.Y.3d 1080, 1082, 104 N.Y.S.3d 596, 128 N.E.3d 674 (N.Y. 2019) ("[W]here the terms of a contract are clear and unambiguous, the intent of the parties must be f......
-
Mangia Rest. Corp. v. Utica First Ins. Co.
...a practical interpretation to the language employed and reading the contract as a whole" ( Tomhannock, LLC v. Roustabout Resources, LLC , 33 N.Y.3d 1080, 1082, 104 N.Y.S.3d 596, 128 N.E.3d 674 [2019], quoting Ellington v. EMI Music, Inc. , 24 N.Y.3d 239, 244, 997 N.Y.S.2d 339, 21 N.E.3d 100......
-
Arista Development, LLC v. Clearmind Holdings, LLC
...by the respective parties in order to conform to the terms of their agreements’ " ( Tomhannock, LLC v. Roustabout Resources, LLC , 33 N.Y.3d 1080, 1082, 104 N.Y.S.3d 596, 128 N.E.3d 674 [2019], quoting 11 Richard A. Lord, Williston on Contracts § 30:1 [4th ed May 2019 update] ). " ‘The best......
-
Stonewall Contracting Corp. v. Long Island Rail Rd. Co.
...practical interpretation to the language employed and reading the contract as a whole’ " ( Tomhannock, LLC v. Roustabout Resources, LLC, 33 N.Y.3d 1080, 1082, 104 N.Y.S.3d 596, 128 N.E.3d 674, quoting Ellington v. EMI Music, Inc., 24 N.Y.3d 239, 244, 997 N.Y.S.2d 339, 21 N.E.3d 1000 ). Furt......