Toney v. State, 84-134
| Decision Date | 26 September 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-134,84-134 |
| Citation | 456 So.2d 559 |
| Parties | James Darrell TONEY, a/k/a James N. Toney, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and Larry G. Bryant, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
We affirm appellant's fifteen-year sentence for armed robbery under section 812.13, Florida Statutes (1983). We agree with appellant's contention, however, that the sentencing guideline scoresheet prepared in conjunction with this case incorrectly assessed seven points against appellant for slight victim injury.
When appellant was sentenced on November 23, 1983, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(7) provided that " [v]ictim injury shall not be scored if not a factor of an offense at conviction." Committee Note (d)(7) to the rule explained that the foregoing provision
implements the intention of the commission that points for victim injury be added only when the defendant is convicted of an offense (scored as either primary or additional offense) which includes physical impact or contact. Victim injury is to be scored for each victim for whom the defendant is convicted of injuring and is limited to physical trauma.
In May, 1984, the supreme court approved an amendment to rule 3.701(d)(7) which provides: "Victim injury shall be scored if it is an element of any offenses at conviction." The Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure (3.701, 3.988--Sentencing Guidelines), 451 So.2d 824 (Fla.1984) (emphasis added). The court noted that this change "makes clear that victim injury points are to be included when physical injury is an element of an offense at conviction." Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure, at 824 n.*.
In light of this clarification, we agree that points for victim injury should not have been assessed against appellant when victim injury does not constitute an element of the convicted offense of armed robbery. The trial court undoubtedly would have reached the same conclusion had it had benefit of the supreme court's subsequent clarification.
The erroneous inclusion of seven points for slight victim injury in appellant's guideline computation in no way alters the correctness of the trial court's ultimate sentencing decision. Deduction of the challenged points reduces appellant's total score to 234...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mischler v. State
...5th DCA 1984);Green v. State, 455 So.2d 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984);Williams v. State, 454 So.2d 751 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984);Toney v. State, 456 So.2d 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).Defendant on a crime spree can be aggravatedManning v. State, 452 So.2d 136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).Non-rehabilitative career crim......
-
Holloman v. State, 85-259
...DCA 1985); Whitfield v. State, 471 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Motyka v. State, 457 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Toney v. State, 456 So.2d 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Hendry v. State, 460 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA The elements of every attempt crime are (1) an intent (or design) to commit so......
-
Bradley v. State, s. 84-2311
...no purpose. Dewberry v. State, 472 So.2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Burney v. State, 402 So.2d 38 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). See Toney v. State, 456 So.2d 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and HALL, JJ., concur. ...
-
Massard v. State, 84-1741
...Procedure, provides: "Victim injury shall be scored if it is an element of any offenses at conviction." The court in Toney v. State, 456 So.2d 559, 560 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), held that "points for victim injury should not have been assessed against appellant when victim injury does not constit......