Tootle v. State
Decision Date | 15 June 1937 |
Docket Number | 26274. |
Citation | 191 S.E. 876,55 Ga.App. 865 |
Parties | TOOTLE v. STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court.
The testimony of the accomplice of the defendant that he and the defendant entered into an agreement to steal hogs and sell them and split the proceeds fifty-fifty, and that in pursuance of this agreement he got the hog for which he and the defendant were indicted for stealing from the defendant and sold it to a named person, was corroborated by testimony which, independently of the testimony of such accomplice connected defendant with the theft of the hog. The trial judge therefore did not err in overruling the defendant's motion for new trial based only on the general grounds.
Error from Superior Court, Tattnall County; J. T. Grice, Judge.
Emmett Tootle was convicted of theft of a hog, and he brings error.
Affirmed.
H. H Elders, of Reidsville, for plaintiff in error.
J. P Dukes, Sol. Gen., of Pembroke, for the State.
The defendant was convicted of the theft of a certain hog, the property of J. R. Rushing. His motion for new trial containing only the general grounds, was overruled, and he excepts. Rushing testified to the loss of the hog described in the indictment, and that the hog, at or about the time it was stolen, was on the open range around his place. Thad Lanier, husband of the defendant's step-granddaughter, a witness for the State, testified that on or about the second Saturday in June, he and the defendant agreed to steal some hogs and sell them and split the proceeds fifty-fifty. Mrs. Thad Lanier testified in part for the State as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial