Town of Andrews v. Clay County
Decision Date | 27 January 1931 |
Docket Number | 643. |
Citation | 156 S.E. 855,200 N.C. 280 |
Parties | TOWN OF ANDREWS et al. v. CLAY COUNTY et al. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Clay County; MacRae, Special Judge.
Action for injunction by Town of Andrews and others against Clay County and another.From a judgment in favor of plaintiffsdefendants appeal.
Affirmed.
This is an action to restrain and enjoin the defendants, Clay county and the sheriff and tax collector of said county, from collecting or attempting to collect taxes levied by Clay county, for the years 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, and 1929, on property located in said county and owned during said years by the plaintiff, town of Andrews, on the ground that said property was exempt during said years from taxation, under the provisions of section 5 of article 5 of the Constitution of North Carolina.
The town of Andrews is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of this state, and located in Cherokee county.
The property on which taxes were levied by the defendant, Clay county, for the years 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, and 1929 consists of 205 acres of land.The said land was owned and used by the plaintiff during said years as the site of a power plant for the generation of electricity, which was transmitted over wires from said power plant in Clay county to the town of Andrews in Cherokee county and there used by said town of Andrews for lighting its streets and municipal buildings, and for distribution among the citizens of said town, for domestic and commercial purposes.The revenue derived from the distribution and sale of electricity to citizens of said town was used to pay the expense of maintaining and operating its electric light and power plant.The town of Andrews purchased the land in Clay county and constructed its power plant thereon under the authority of an act of the General Assembly of this state.It paid for said land and for the construction of said power plant out of funds raised by the issuance and sale of its municipal bonds.
The action was heard on motion of plaintiffs for judgment on the facts admitted in the pleadings as above stated.This motion was allowed.
From judgment declaring that the levy of taxes by the defendantClay county, for the years 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, and 1929, on the property described in the complaint, was illegal and void, and restraining and enjoining the defendants, permanently, from collecting or attempting to collect said taxes, or any part thereof, defendants appealed to the Supreme Court.
R. L. Phillips, of Robbinsville, and J. B. Gray and W. C. Wakefield, both of Hayesville, for appellants.
Dillard & Hill, of Murphy, for appellees.
Section 5 of article 5 of the Constitution of North Carolina, adopted by the people of this state in 1868, is as follows:
The Machinery Acts enacted by the General Assembly of this state (Pub. Acts 1929, c. 344, § 304), under which property, both real and personal, was assessed for taxation for the years 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, and 1929, each, contain a section in words as...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
