Town of Eaton v. Bouslog

Decision Date16 January 1956
Docket NumberNo. 17753,17753
CitationTown of Eaton v. Bouslog, 292 P.2d 343, 133 Colo. 130 (Colo. 1956)
Parties, 54 A.L.R.2d 1320 TOWN OF EATON, Colorado, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Nina A. BOUSLOG and John S. Bousiog, Defendants in Error.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Wm. C. Rhodes, Greeley, for plaintiff in error.

Robert G. Smith, Greeley for defendants in error.

HOLLAND, Justice.

The board of trustees of the Town of Eaton, an incorporated town, on December 13, 1954, adopted an ordinance entitled 'An Ordinance Declaring Necessity for Improvement of Town of Eaton Cemetery by Enlargement, and Authorizing Town of Eaton to Acquire Necessary Land Therefor by Purchase, Condemnation, or Otherwise.'

On January 14, 1955, the Town filed its petition in condemnation proceedings whereby it sought to condemn the land adjacent to the cemetery and owned by defendants in error.Motion to dismiss said petition was filed by defendants on the ground that the petition did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and further, that the Town is not authorized to prosecute or maintain a proceeding in eminent domain to take private lands for cemetery purposes.Hearing was had on said motion on June 13, 1955, after which the court entered judgment of dismissal of the petition.The Town, by writ of error, seeks review of that judgment.

The one question presented which is determinative of this controversy is: Has an incorporated town, under the constitution and laws of Colorado, authority to condemn private lands for use as a cemetery?The authority to exercise such power, being against the common right to own and keep property, must be given expressly or by clear implication; it can never be implied from doubtful language.Under the stateconstitution the classification and powers of incorporated towns is governed by general laws.Const.XIV, Secs. 13, 14.

The statutory right to establish cemeteries is to be found in C.R.S. '53, 139-32-1(32), which is:

'Cemeteries.--To establish and regulate cemeteries within or without the corporation, and acquire lands therefor, by purchase or otherwise, and cause cemeteries to be removed and prohibit their establishment within one mile of the corporation.'

The grant of power thus conferred, is limited to acquisition by purchase or otherwise.It cannot be implied from the word 'otherwise', that the town is given authority to condemn lands for such purpose.If it can be said that the use of this word creates a doubt, the power of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Larson v. Sinclair Transp. Co.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 10 September 2012
    ...or by clear implication; it can never be implied from doubtful language.” Coquina, 643 P.2d at 522 (quoting Town of Eaton v. Bouslog, 133 Colo. 130, 131–32, 292 P.2d 343, 344 (1956)); see also Potashnik v. Pub. Serv. Co. of Colo., 126 Colo. 98, 101, 247 P.2d 137, 138 (1952).B. Condemnation ......
  • Coquina Oil Corp. v. Harry Kourlis Ranch
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 5 April 1982
    ...is the rule in determining the scope of the condemnation power delegated pursuant to legislative enactment. E.g., Town of Eaton v. Bouslog, 133 Colo. 130, 292 P.2d 343 (1956); Beth Medrosh Hagodol v. City of Aurora, 126 Colo. 267, 248 P.2d 732 (1952); Potashnik v. Public Service Co., 126 Co......
  • State, Dept. of Health v. The Mill
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 8 April 1991
    ...held that the power to "acquire land ..., by purchase or otherwise," did not confer authority to condemn. Town of Eaton v. Bouslog, 133 Colo. 130, 132, 292 P.2d 343, 344 (1956). The 1979 statute authorized CSDH to "acquire and dispose of any designated processing site, including any interes......
  • Spomer v. City of Grand Junction
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 10 October 1960
    ...The city was engaged in a proprietary rather than a governmental function in the operation of the cemetery. Town of Eaton v. Bouslog, 133 Colo. 130, 292 P.2d 343, 54 A.L.R.2d 1320. Its liability for tort while so engaged was the same as that of a private corporation. Veraguth v. City of Den......
  • Get Started for Free