Town of Fairplay v. Board of Com'rs of Park County
Decision Date | 07 October 1901 |
Citation | 67 P. 152,29 Colo. 57 |
Parties | TOWN OF FAIRPLAY v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF PARK COUNTY. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Error to district court, Park county.
Action by the town of Fairplay against the board of county commissioners of Park county. From a judgment of the court of appeals affirming a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error. Reversed.
C. A. Wilkin, for plaintiff in error.
August Pease, for defendant in error.
Fairplay a municipal corporation within the limits of the county of Park, claims the right to recover from the county her proportion of the road tax collected by the county for the years 1887 to 1894, inclusive, amounting in the aggregate including interest, to the sum of about $2,000. The statute under which the town claims is as follows: Mills' Ann. St. § 3953. In the year 1887 the county commissioners of Park county, under this section, directed that one mill of the road tax collected on the corporate property of the towns of Como, Fairplay, and Alma be paid to the authorities of said towns, respectively. Since 1887 no action appropriating money under the statute has been taken by the county commissioners. In the first cause of action, claim is made for the amount collected by the county of Park under the resolution of 1887, which it is alleged has never been paid to the authorities of the town. The other seven causes of action are based upon the alleged right of the town to recover the amount actually paid by the town, with interest, for the repair of the streets within the corporate limits. A demurrer was filed to the complaint, and, upon hearing, the demurrer was sustained, judgment was rendered for the defendant, an appeal was taken to the court of appeals, and the case was sent here from the court of appeals.
The demurrer, in general, is upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and upon the ground that the plaintiff is barred from enforcing its claim, if it ever had one, on account of its unexplained and culpable delay and laches in not heretofore bringing and taking appropriate proceedings to enforce the same, and also upon the ground that the said claim in the first four causes of action did not accrue within six years preceding the commencement of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Liber v. Flor
...of El Paso County v. Bish, 18 Colo. 474, 33 P. 184; Pitkin County v. Ball, 22 Colo. 125, 43 P. 1000; Town of Fairplay v. Board of Com'rs of Park County, 29 Colo. 57, 67 P. 152; Miller v. Ouray Electric Light and Power Company et al., 18 Colo.App. 131, 70 P. 447; Richardson v. Belknap, 73 Co......
-
Wigger v. McKee, 88CA1523
...(1968); M & M Oil Transportation, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners, 143 Colo. 309, 353 P.2d 613 (1960); Fairplay v. Board of County Commissioners, 29 Colo. 57, 67 P. 152 (1901). For the continuing efficacy of this rule, see Johnson v. Jefferson County Board of Health, 662 P.2d 463 (Col......
-
Piz v. Housing Authority of the City and County of Denver
... ... Fairplay v. Board of County Commissioners, ... Page 913 ... 29 ... 76, 89 P.2d 529; City and County of Denver v. Park Hill Golf Club, 127 Colo. 592, 259 P.2d 617. Estoppel was ... ...
-
City of Colorado Springs v. Colorado City
... ... from District Court, El Paso County; Wm. P. Seeds, Judge ... Action ... right of way through the streets of the then town of Colorado ... City, the defendant agreed to ... of Colorado City, when the board of trustees of said town ... shall confirm to ... Denver, 21 Colo. 1, 40 P. 237; Town of Fairplay v. Park Co., ... 29 Colo. 57, 67 P. 152; ... ...