Townes v. State, 4079

Decision Date14 December 1972
Docket NumberNo. 4079,4079
Citation504 P.2d 46
PartiesIn the Matter of the Direct Criminal Contempt of Fred Townes. Fred TOWNES, a. k. a. Freddie Steven Townes, Appellant, v. STATE of Wyoming, Appellee. . Appellee's Petition for Rehearing Denied
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

C. A. Brimmer, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Stacy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Cheyenne, for appellee.

Before McINTYRE, C. J., and PARKER, McEWAN and GUTHRIE, JJ.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The State of Wyoming, by and through its attorneys, Clarence A. Brimmer, Attorney General, and Richard A. Stacy, Assistant Attorney General, has petitioned for rehearing in connection with our previous opinion, reported at 502 P.2d 991.

In its petition, the State argues:

'In finding that Rule 41(a), Wyoming Rules of Criminal Procedure, was not properly complied with, the Court has unduly restricted the power of the District Courts of this State to summarily punish for contemptuous conduct occurring in the presence of the court. * * *'

We have not said the act here involved was one which could not be disposed of summarily under Rule 41(a). The matter was not disposed of summarily. The actions of the appellant took place on November 30, 1971. On December 3, 1971 'WHEREAS, On November 30, 1971, at a regular session of the above-entitled Court and in the immediate view and presence of the presiding judge thereof, Freddie Steven Townes, did act in a disorderly, contemptuous and insolent manner and did impair the respect due the Court's autority (sic);

the trial court issued a 'Citation to Show Cause' wherein it was stated:

'IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Freddie Steven Townes appear before this Court at Cheyenne, Wyoming on December 6, 1971, at 2:00 o'clock P. M., then and there to show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty of, and punished for contempt in the presence of the Court.' (Emphasis supplied.)

Thereafter, on December 6, 1971, the matter was heard and 'Judgment and Sentence' was entered and filed on December 10, 1971, in which it was stated:

'On the 6th day of December, 1971, there came on regularly to be heard the above matter of the direct criminal contempt of Fred Townes.

'THE COURT FURTHER FINDS Fred Townes guilty of a direct criminal contempt in the presence of the court on the 30th day of November, 1971, * * *.'

It is clear the matter was not disposed of summarily by the trial court but a hearing to determine guilt was held six days later. In the judgment and sentence which was entered December 10, 1971, the judge did certify 'that the attached transcript of the Court's narrative of events occurring on the 30th day of November, 1971, is factually true and correct in every respect.' Thus, it is apparent the contemptor heard the essential facts constituting the contempt charge for the first time at the hearing on ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Connors v. Connors
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • February 7, 1989
    ... ... to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Wyoming, 6 and had moved from the state to avoid jurisdiction of the court. In light of its findings and the additional fact that ... District Court, Ninth Judicial Dist., 647 P.2d 1368, 1374 (Wyo.1982); Townes v. State, 502 P.2d 991, 993, reh'g denied, 504 P.2d 46 (Wyo.1972); Estate of Mayne, 345 P.2d 790, ... ...
  • Anderson v. Anderson, 83-25
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • August 9, 1983
    ... ... Tucker v. State, 35 Wyo. 430, 251 P. 460 (1926); Laramie National Bank v. Steinhoff, 7 Wyo. 464, 53 P. 299 (1898) ... Horn v. District Court, Ninth Judicial District, supra; Townes v. State, Wyo., 502 P.2d 991, reh. denied 504 P.2d 46 (1972). We conclude that, in acting to ... ...
  • Jaramillo v. State, 90-83
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1990
    ... ... 41(a) in Horn, 647 P.2d 1368 and Townes v. State, 502 P.2d 991, reh'g denied 504 P.2d 46 (Wyo.1972) ... 4 "[T]he power to punish for contempt is not without limitation." In re Contempt of ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT