Trailmobile Co. v. Ray
| Decision Date | 20 May 1947 |
| Docket Number | Case Number: 33021 |
| Citation | 199 Okla. 9,1947 OK 170,180 P.2d 1005 |
| Parties | TRAILMOBILE CO. v. RAY |
| Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
¶0 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION - Cross-petition to review award or order dismissed if not filed within 20 days after notice of award or order.
Under the provisions of 85 O. S. 1941 § 29, it is necessary that a proceeding to review an order or award be filed within 20 days after a copy of such order or award is sent to the parties. Held, that a cross-petition must be filed within 20 days after such order or award is sent, and where said cross-petition is not filed within the time provided by statute, any proceeding based thereon will be dismissed.
Original proceeding in the Supreme Court by Trailmobile Company and American Mutual Liability Insurance Company; its insurance carrier, petitioners, to review an award made to O.P. Ray. Motion to dismiss the cross-appeal of O.P. Ray sustained.
Robert D. Crowe and Hemry & Hemry, both of Oklahoma City, for petitioners.
W.A. Kerr, of Oklahoma City, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.
¶1 This is a proceeding brought by petitioner, Trailmobile Company, and its insurance carrier, American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, to review an award made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of O.P. Ray. The award was entered on the 6th day of February, 1946. The Secretary of the State Industrial Commission certified that a copy of said award was sent to the parties affected on the same date. On the 10th day of March, 1946, O.P. Ray filed a cross-petition for review.
¶2 A motion to dismiss has been filed by the petitioners for the reason that the cross-petition of O.P. Ray was not filed within the time allowed by 85 O. S. 1941 § 29. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. In Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. McFee, 198 Okla. 37, 174 P.2d 918, we said:
¶3 See, also, in this connection, Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. Williams, 126 Okla. 47, 258 P. 731.
¶4 The cross-petition of O.P. Ray is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Smith v. State Indus. Court
...review. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. McFee, 198 Okl. 37, 174 P.2d 918; Tulsa Hotel v. Sparks, 197 Okl. 644, 174 P.2d 920; Trailmobile Co. v. Ray, 199 Okl. 9, 180 P.2d 1005. The filing of a bond with the trial tribunal's secretary, his approval thereof and issuance of a certificate showing such f......
- Wallace v. Childers
-
Bledsoe v. Munsingwear Corp.
... ... Tulsa Hotel Co. v. Sparks, 197 Okl. 644, 174 P.2d 920; Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. McFee, 198 Okl. 37, 174 P.2d 918; Trailmobile Co. v. Ray, 199 Okl. 9, 180 P.2d 1005 ... Essential provisions of § 29, governing proceedings before the Supreme Court to review State Industrial Court awards, specify time within which proceedings must be commenced and, in pertinent part, sets forth these requirements: ... " * * ... ...
- Trailmobile Co. v. Ray