Traina Enterprises v. RaceTrac Petroleum

Decision Date18 November 1999
Docket NumberNo. A99A2409.,A99A2409.
Citation525 S.E.2d 712,241 Ga. App. 18
PartiesTRAINA ENTERPRISES, INC. v. RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Webb, Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair, David F. Root, Austin E. Carter, Atlanta, for appellant.

Newman, Sapp & Davis, Alan L. Newman, Allen E. Lockerman IV, Atlanta, for appellee.

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

The four elements to any tort action are a duty, a breach of that duty, causation and damages.1 A third party does not owe a duty to an employer to refrain from injuring the employer's employee.2 As part of an employee conference held at a state park, RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. rented a pontoon boat from Traina Enterprises, Inc. Karen Ringrose, a RaceTrac employee, was crossing a gangway to get to the boat when the gangway collapsed, fatally injuring her. Does RaceTrac have a tort cause of action against Traina for damages it allegedly suffered because it cancelled the conference after Ringrose was injured? We hold that RaceTrac does not have a tort cause of action because, even though Traina owed Ringrose a duty not to injure her, Traina owed no such duty to RaceTrac to refrain from injuring its employee. We therefore reverse the trial court's denial of Traina's motion for summary judgment on RaceTrac's negligence claims. But because there are genuine questions of fact as to RaceTrac's additional breach of contract claim, we affirm the denial of summary judgment on that claim.

RaceTrac organized a conference for its employees at Red Top Mountain State Park from May 8 to 10, 1996. RaceTrac rented a pontoon boat from Traina for the employees to use on Lake Allatoona on the second day of the conference. At about 1:00 p.m. on May 9, a group of employees went to the dock area where the boat was moored. As they were crossing Traina's gangway to the dock, the gangway collapsed. RaceTrac employee Ringrose was pinned between the handrails of the collapsed gangway and eventually died from her injuries. Several other employees were also injured during the incident, after which RaceTrac cancelled the rest of the conference. Ringrose's family sued Traina, as did several injured RaceTrac employees, and each of those cases was settled without trial. RaceTrac also sued Traina for negligence and for breach of the boat rental contract, seeking $66,426 in damages for the cost of organizing and conducting the conference. Specifically, RaceTrac claims $42,615 for employee salaries, $10,628 in travel expenses, $6,490 as miscellaneous fees paid to the park, $4,222 for lodging and meals and mileage, and $2,471 for materials.

Traina moved for summary judgment, arguing, among other things, that it cannot be held liable in tort because it owed no duty to RaceTrac and that it cannot be held liable for the alleged breach of contract because the claimed damages are too remote. The trial court denied the motion as to both the tort and contract claims. Traina then applied to this court for interlocutory review of the rulings, and we granted the application.

1. In denying Traina's motion for summary judgment on RaceTrac's tort claim, the trial court found that Traina could be held liable in tort if it negligently breached its boat rental contract with RaceTrac. The finding is erroneous.

A defendant's mere negligent performance of a contractual duty does not create a tort cause of action; rather, a defendant's breach of a contract may give rise to a tort cause of action only if the defendant has also breached an independent duty created by statute or common law.3 A third party, like Traina, owes no independent legal duty to an employer, such as RaceTrac, not to injure the employer's employee.4 So even if Traina negligently breached its boat rental contract with RaceTrac, it owed no other independent duty to RaceTrac to avoid injuring Ringrose. Absent a legal duty outside the contract, there can be no action in tort based merely on Traina's alleged contract breach.

The trial court's erroneous denial of Traina's motion for summary judgment...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • In re Deotare
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • March 26, 2018
    ...defendant's failure to perform a contractual duty cannot serve as the basis for a negligence claim. Traina Enters., Inc. v. RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc., 525 S.E.2d 712, 714 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). Plaintiffs cannot assert a breach of the common law duty of ordinary care based on their allegations......
  • S & A INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Bank Atlanta
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • December 1, 2000
    ...has also breached an independent duty created by statute or common law. (Citation omitted.) Traina Enterprises v. RaceTrac Petroleum, 241 Ga.App. 18, 19-20(1), 525 S.E.2d 712 (1999). Accordingly, in making this argument, S & A relies upon the common law rule regarding voluntary undertakings......
  • Duncan v. Vantage Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Delaware
    • March 26, 2019
    ...George law, a claim for negligence requires "duty, a breach of that duty, causation and damages." Traina Enterprises, Inc. v. RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc., 525 S.E.2d 712, 713 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999) To survive the Rule 12(b)(6) motion, Count V of the Amended Complaint "must state enough facts to r......
  • McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP v. Keller
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 22, 2004
    ...to any tort action are a duty, a breach of that duty, causation and damages." (Footnote omitted.) Traina Enterprises v. RaceTrac Petroleum, 241 Ga.App. 18, 525 S.E.2d 712 (1999). Numerous Georgia cases have discussed the element of duty in the context of attorneys' relationships with noncli......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Torts - Deron R. Hicks
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 56-1, September 2004
    • Invalid date
    ...598 S.E.2d at 893. 122. Id. at 174, 598 S.E.2d at 895. 123. Id. at 172, 598 S.E.2d at 894 (quoting Traina Enters. v. RaceTrac Petroleum, 241 Ga. App. 18, 18, 525 S.E.2d 712, 713 (1999)). 124. Id. See Karpowicz v. Hyles, 247 Ga. App. 292, 543 S.E.2d 51 (2000). 125. 174 Ga. App. 550, 330 S.E.......
  • Litigating Nursing Home Cases in Georgia
    • United States
    • State Bar of Georgia Georgia Bar Journal No. 8-2, October 2002
    • Invalid date
    ...51. See, e.g., Lamb v. Candler Gen. Hosp., Inc. 262 Ga. 70, 71, 413 S.E.2d 720, 722 (1992). 52. See Traina Enters. v. Racetrac Petroleum, 241 Ga.App. 18, 525 S.E.2d 712, 713 Bradley Ctr., Inc. v. Wessner, 250 Ga. 199, 200, 2296 S.E.2d 693, 695 (1982). 53. Moore, 216 Ga. App. at 300, 454 S.E......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT