Trans-State Hay & Feed Corp. v. Faberge, Inc.

Decision Date07 October 1974
Docket NumberTRANS-STATE,O-M
Citation360 N.Y.S.2d 886,35 N.Y.2d 669
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Parties, 319 N.E.2d 201 HAY & FEED CORP., Appellant, v. FABERGE, INC., and Tone-atic Products, Inc., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division, 42 A.D.2d 535, 344 N.Y.S.2d 730.

BREITEL, C.J., and GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, SAMUEL RABIN and WITMER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Shaitelman v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co., 79 Civ. 4488.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 5, 1981
    ... ... North Shore Bottling Co., Inc. v. Schmidt & Sons, Inc., 22 N.Y.2d 171, 179, 292 N.Y.S.2d 86, 239 N.E.2d 189 (1968); Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminum Limited Sales, Inc., 4 N.Y.2d 403, 408, 176 ... ...
  • Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • July 6, 1976
    ...for in such a case only a private wrong, and not a public right, is involved (see, e.g., Trans-State Hay & Feed Corp. v. Faberge, Inc., 35 N.Y.2d 669, 360 N.Y.S.2d 886, 319 N.E.2d 201, affg. on mem. at App.Div., 42 A.D.2d 535, 344 N.Y.S.2d 730; Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville v. Hayden Pu......
  • Mendelson v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 2, 1983
    ...of action. (Weir Metro v. Ambu-Service, Inc., 57 N.Y.2d 911, 456 N.Y.S.2d 757, 442 N.E.2d 1268, Trans-State Hay & Feed Corpo. v. Faberge, 35 N.Y.2d 669, 360 N.Y.S.2d 886, 319 N.E.2d 201.) Plaintiffs' second and third causes of action assert violations of sections 349 and 350 of the General ......
  • Charles v. Onondaga Community College
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 13, 1979
    ...Wegman v. Dairylea Cooperative, supra; Trans-State Hay & Feed Corp. v. Faberge, Inc., 42 A.D.2d 535, 344 N.Y.S.2d 730, aff'd 35 N.Y.2d 669, 319 N.E.2d 201). The order should be reversed and the motion Order unanimously reversed with costs and motion granted. 1 For example, plaintiff's compl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT