Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Arbogast
Decision Date | 10 June 1987 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 85-0246-E(K). |
Citation | 662 F. Supp. 164 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of West Virginia |
Parties | TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. Helen ARBOGAST, Administratrix of the Estate of Don H. Arbogast, Deceased, Defendant. |
Michael Bonasso, Kay, Casto & Chaney, Charleston, W.Va., for plaintiff.
James C. Peterson, Hill & Peterson, Charleston, W.Va., for defendant.
Presently before this Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties. The matter has been fully briefed and the parties have entered into and filed a joint stipulation of facts and questions presented which will be set forth below. This action arises out of a dispute as to underinsured motorist coverage of an automobile insurance policy containing an "owned but not insured for this coverage" exclusion. This declaratory judgment action is brought pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2201 and W.Va.Code § 55-13-1, et seq. for the purpose of seeking a declaration from this Court as to the rights of the parties with respect to the insurance policy here in question. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked by virtue of diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the Court being of the opinion that this matter involves a controversy between citizens of different states exceeding the sum or value of $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
The parties have entered into and filed the following joint stipulation of facts and questions presented:
The terms of the Transamerica policy regarding underinsured motorists coverage is as follows; the underlined portions below appear as bold face type in the policy here in question:
Looking at the above policy language, the parties have stipulated that at the time of the accident, Arbogast was a covered person within the meaning of the policy and McCollom was operating an underinsured motor vehicle. The exclusion language applicable here under which Transamerica has denied coverage reads as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
First Financial Ins. v. Crossroads Lounge
... ... 1-3, Kelly v. Painter, 202 W.Va. 344, 504 S.E.2d 171 (1998); syl. pts. 1-2, Miller v. Lemon, 194 W.Va. 129, 459 S.E.2d 406 (1995); Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Arbogast, 662 F.Supp. 164 (N.D.W.Va.1987); syl. pts. 1-2, Shamblin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 175 W.Va. 337, 332 S.E.2d 639 (1985); ... ...
-
Keiper v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
... ... 16, 1989) (held that an insurance policy, by clear and unambiguous terms, can prohibit the stacking of medical coverage). See also, Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Arbogast, 662 F.Supp. 164, 165 (N.D.W.Va.1987) (held that a policy can exclude coverage for vehicles that were "owned but not insured for ... ...
-
Robertson v. Fowler
... ... Pt. 8, National Mut. Ins. Co. v. McMahon & Sons, Inc., 177 W.Va. 734, 356 S.E.2d 488 (1987) ... 2. Before ... See Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Arbogast, 662 F.Supp. 164, 168 (N.D.W.Va.), aff'd, 835 F.2d 875 (4th Cir.1987) ... ...
-
Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Mike Ross, Inc.
... ... See Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. v. McMahon & Sons, Inc., 177 W.Va. 734, 356 S.E.2d 488, 495 (1987) (noting that a finding of ... See Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Arbogast, 662 F.Supp. 164, 168 (N.D.W.Va. 1987) (explaining that in West Virginia, ... ...