Transportation of Juveniles, Matter of

Decision Date07 May 1991
Docket NumberNo. 9018DC857,9018DC857
Citation403 S.E.2d 557,102 N.C.App. 806
PartiesIn the Matter of TRANSPORTATION OF JUVENILES.
CourtNorth Carolina Court of Appeals

Deputy County Atty. J. Edwin Pons, Greensboro, for appellant, Guilford County Sheriff's Dept.

No appellee's brief filed.

WYNN, Judge.

I

On 13 July 1990, Guilford County District Court Judge Laurence C. McSwain entered an order, ex mero motu and without an action or proceeding having been filed, directing the Guilford County Sheriff's Department to "transport any delinquent or undisciplined juvenile from the Guilford County Detention Center to the designated Juvenile Court in High Point, North Carolina, or Greensboro, North Carolina, by 9:30 a.m. on days required and to transport any designated delinquent or undisciplined juvenile from the Juvenile Courtroom in High Point, North Carolina, or Greensboro, North Carolina, to the Guilford County Juvenile Detention Center." Prior to the entry of the district court's order, the practice in Guilford County was that juvenile court counselors transported designated delinquent or undisciplined juveniles who were in secure custody to and from court.

The Guilford County Sheriff's Department now appeals from the entry of Judge McSwain's order.

II

Judge McSwain's order cites N.C.G.S. §§ 7A-291(6), 7A-574(d) and "the inherent power of a District Court Judge to enter orders necessary for the efficient exercise of the administration of justice" as authorizing the entry of the order below. We shall address these propositions seriatim.

North Carolina General Statutes section 7A-291(6) provides as follows:

"Additional powers of district court judges"

In addition to the jurisdiction and powers assigned in this chapter, a district court judge has the following powers:

....

(6) To issue all process and orders necessary or proper in the exercise of his powers and authority, and to effectuate his lawful judgments and decrees.

N.C.Gen.Stat. § 7A-291(6) (1989).

We do not believe this statute was intended to give a district court judge the power to enter an order ex mero motu when no action is before the court. A court cannot undertake to adjudicate a controversy on its own motion; rather, it can adjudicate a controversy only when a party presents the controversy to it, and then, only if it is presented in the form of a proper pleading. 20 Am.Jur.2d Courts § 94 (1965). Thus, before a court may act there must be some appropriate application invoking the judicial power of the court with respect to the matter in question. Id. See Carolina Freight Carriers Corp. v Local 61, International Bhd. of Teamsters, 11 N.C.App. 159, 180 S.E.2d 461, cert. denied, 278 N.C. 701, 181 S.E.2d 601 (1971) (holding that "the filing of a complaint or the issuance of summons pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 3, [was] a condition precedent to the issuance of an injunction or restraining order." 11 N.C.App. at 161, 180 S.E.2d at 463). See also N.C.Gen.Stat. § 7A-193 (1989) (stating in pertinent part, that, "A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court.").

It is clear in this case that no action or proceeding had been commenced. We conclude that without an action pending before it, the district court was without jurisdiction to enter an order pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-291(6).

For similar reasons, N.C.G.S. § 7A-574(d) does not provide a sufficient ground for entering the order below. Section 7A-574(d) falls under the Juvenile Code which requires that the trial court have jurisdiction before exercising the powers granted thereunder. Since the district court was without jurisdiction because there was no action before it, we must conclude that section 7A-574(d) does not provide the necessary basis for the entry of Judge McSwain's order.

We likewise conclude that the court below lacked the inherent power to enter its order. Courts have the inherent power to do only those things which are reasonably necessary for the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc., COA05-924.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 2006
    ... ... to effect a foreclosure to transfer title to the property being foreclosed;" and (2) "Any matter where all parties seek monetary damages in the aggregate of $15,000 or less in total damages ... ...
  • In re A.B.D.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 6, 2005
    ...power of the court with respect to the matter in question.'" Id. at 444, 581 S.E.2d at 795 (quoting In re Transp. of Juveniles, 102 N.C.App. 806, 808, 403 S.E.2d 557, 558-59 (1991)). As this Court made plain in In re Transp. of Juveniles, 102 N.C.App. at 808, 403 S.E.2d at A court cannot un......
  • Rite Color Chemical Co., Inc. v. Velvet Textile Co., Inc., 9118SC254
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 7, 1992
    ... ... Accordingly, if a trial court determines as a matter of law that a contract to sell goods or any clause of such contract was "unconscionable" at the ... ...
  • Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v. Triple S Mktg. Grp.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • July 19, 2011
    ...over the controversy in the absence of a proper application invoking its authority to act. See In re Transportation of Juveniles, 102N.C. App. 806, 808, 403 S.E.2d 557, 558 (1991) (stating that "[a] court cannot undertake to adjudicate a controversy on its own motion; rather it can [do so] ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT