Transylvania University v. City of Lexington
Decision Date | 10 September 1842 |
Citation | 42 Ky. 25 |
Parties | Transylvania University v. City of Lexington. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Public Highways. Easements, & c.
ERROR TO THE FAYETTE CIRCUIT.
Hickey for plaintiff
Robinson & Johnson for defendant.
Case stated.
THE grounds of Tranyslvania, surrounded by open streets were also formerly divided by Third street, which once separated that portion of the now continuous lawn, on which the buildings of the preparatory department stand, from the more elevated site of the College edifice. In 1831, prior to the erection of the latter structure, the Trustees of the University obtained from the Trustees of the then town of Lexington, their consent to the occlusion of so much of said street as divided the College grounds, with the proviso, that it should be again opened " whenever, in the opinion of (the) Board (of the Trustees of Lexington) the interest of the town (should) require it to be so opened. " It was accordingly closed, and the College edifice was then erected on the highest point of an area of unbroken continuity.
To ratify and establish the said agreement for closing a portion of Third street, the Legislature of Kentucky, in 1835, enacted the following statute:
Afterwards, at the instance of some of the citizens, the municipal council of the city of Lexington having determined to re-open so much of said street as had been thus closed, the Trustees of the University filed a bill in Chancery for enjoining them. But, on the final hearing, on bill and answer, the Circuit Judge dismissed the bill. And that decree is now sought to be reversed.
Decree of Circuit Court.
The University relies on the foregoing enactment, as an authoritative, unqualified, and perpetual obliteration, of so much of the street as had been closed. The city denies the power of the Legislature, to abolish any portion of the street, without the consent of the municipal authorities, or of the citizens immediately interested--insists that no such consent was ever given-- and moreover, contends, that the enactment relied on, was intended and should be construed, as only ratifying the agreement, as made, for closing the street,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Powell v. McKelvey
... ... in title had dedicated to city or state for use as such, ... owned fee of land to center of street, city ... owner's property without due process of law. ( ... Transylvania University v. City of Lexington , 42 Ky ... 25, 3 B. Mon. 25, 38 Am ... ...
-
Village of Sandpoint v. Doyle
... ... render it liable for any damage that might be caused thereby ... (City of Topeka v. Hempstead, 58 Kan. 328, 49 P. 87; ... Mischke v. City of ... owner's property without due process of law ... (Transylvania University v. City of Lexington, 42 ... Ky. 25, 3 B. Mon. 25, 38 Am. Dec ... ...
-
DeRossette v. Jefferson County
...no doubt. In reference to that question, the court based its conclusion somewhat on the old case of Transylvania University v. City of Lexington, 3 B. Mon. 25, 42 Ky. 25, 38 Am. Dec. 173, which laid down this "Every owner of ground on any street in Lexington, has a right, as inviolable as i......
-
DeRossette v. Jefferson County
... ... the city. Near St. Helens it intersected the railroad tracks ... at grade. The ... 569, 99 S.W.2d 737, and ... Henderson v. City of Lexington, 132 Ky. 390, 111 ... S.W. 318, 22 L.R.A.,N.S., 20. A casual reading of ... the old case of Transylvania University v. City of ... Lexington, 3 B.Mon. 25, 42 Ky. 25, 38 Am.Dec ... ...