Traub v. Liekefet

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
CitationTraub v. Liekefet, 171 N.Y.S.2d 865, 4 N.Y.2d 747 (N.Y. 1958)
Decision Date20 February 1958
Parties, 148 N.E.2d 912 Carolyn TRAUB et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George LIEKEFET et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 2 A.D.2d 22, 152 N.Y.S.2d 971.

Social guest and her husband brought action against hosts for injuries sustained by guest when rug suddenly flew out from under guest when she entered an unlighted vestibule at home of hosts and was thrown into an open space down an unprotected, unguarded, and unlighted open cellar stairs, and for medical expenses and loss of services resulting to the husband because of the guest's injuries.

From a judgment of the Supreme Court at Trial Term, McGivern, J., and a jury, entered October 11, 1955, in the Bronx County Clerk's office in favor of the guest for $3,200 and in favor of the husband for $1,800, the hosts appealed.

The Appellate Division reversed the judgment, directed judgment to be entered in favor of the hosts dismissing the complaint, and held that evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support a verdict in favor of the guest and her husband.

The guest and her husband appealed to the Court of Appeals, contending that the Trial Term, over objection of guest and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Sideman v. Guttman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 27, 1972
    ...813, affd. 10 N.Y.2d 991, 224 N.Y.S.2d 675, 180 N.E.2d 257; Traub v. Liekefet, 2 A.D.2d 22, 152 N.Y.S.2d 971, affd. 4 N.Y.2d 747, 171 N.Y.S.2d 865, 148 N.E.2d 912). The duty which the owner of premises owes to a social guest is twofold: (1) he must abstain from inflicting intentional, wanto......
  • Golding v. Mauss
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 6, 1969
    ...unusual slipperiness does not impose liability on a licensee (Traub v. Liekefet, 2 A.D.2d 22, 152 N.Y.S.2d 971, affd. 4 N.Y.2d 747, 171 N.Y.S.2d 865, 148 N.E.2d 912). And this is so despite the fact that the social visitor would hardly realize the Even should the facts here be held to call ......
  • Plotz v. Greene
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 15, 1961
    ...by any such defect (Krause v. Alper, 4 N.Y.2d 518, 176 N.Y.S.2d 349; Traub v. Liekefet, 2 A.D.2d 22, 152 N.Y.S.2d 971, affirmed 4 N.Y.2d 747, 171 N.Y.S.2d 865; see, e. g., Dotson v. Haddock, supra). BELDOCK, Acting P. J., and UGHETTA, KLEINFELD and BRENNAN, JJ., concur. CHRIST, J., dissents......
  • Krause v. Alper
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 25, 1958
    ...A.D.2d 354, 156 N.Y.S.2d 85, affirmed 3 N.Y.2d 725, 163 N.Y.S.2d 966; Traub v. Liekefet, 2 A.D.2d 22, 152 N.Y.S.2d 971, affirmed 4 N.Y.2d 747, 171 N.Y.S.2d 865, (see, also, Comeau v. Comeau, 285 Mass, 578, 581, 582, 189 N.E. 588, 92 A.L.R. 1002; Prosser on Torts (2d ed., 1955), § 77, pp. 44......
  • Get Started for Free