Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Henderson Cotton Mills
Decision Date | 25 March 1905 |
Citation | 120 Ky. 218,85 S.W. 1090 |
Parties | TRAVELERS' INS. CO. v. HENDERSON COTTON MILLS. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Henderson County.
"To be officially reported."
Action by the Henderson Cotton Mills against the Travelers' Insurance Company on an employer's indemnity policy. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
J. A Dean and J. F. Lockett, for appellant.
Montgomery Merritt, for appellee.
On February 22, 1901, John Warren, an employé of the Henderson Cotton Mills, was killed; suit was brought by his administrator against it, and a judgment was recovered for $2,944.40 and costs, which was affirmed by this court. Henderson Cotton Mills v. Warren's Administrator, 70 S.W. 658, 24 Ky. Law Rep. 1030. The Henderson Cotton Mills paid the judgment, and then instituted this suit against the Travelers' Insurance Company on a policy issued to it on the 4th of April, 1900, indemnifying it for the period of one year against such losses. The policy reads as follows:
"In consideration of the warranties in the application for this policy, a copy of which is hereto attached and which is made a part of this contract, and of two hundred and ten dollars ($210.00) premium, the Travelers' Insurance Company, of Hartford, Connecticut (hereinafter called 'The Company'), does hereby agree to indemnify Henderson Cotton Mills of Henderson, county of Henderson state of Kentucky (hereinafter called 'The Assured'), for the period of twelve months beginning on the fourth day of April, 1900, at noon, and ending on the fourth day of April, 1901, at noon, standard time, at the place where this policy has been countersigned, against loss from common law or statutory liability for damages on account of bodily injuries, fatal or non-fatal accidentally suffered within the period of this policy, by any employé or employés of the assured while on duty within the factory, shop, or yards mentioned in said application, or upon the ways immediately adjacent thereto provided for the use of such employés or the public, in and during the operation of the trade or business described in the said application: subject to the following agreements, which are to be construed as conditions."
Here follow 16 conditions, the 1st, 9th, 10th, 11th, and 14th of which are as follows:
The plaintiff did not allege in its petition that John Warren the person injured, was over 12...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Conqueror Zinc & Lead Company, Plaintiff, And Appellant v. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. And
... ... Munro v. Casualty Co., 96 N.Y.S. 705; ... National Mills v. Marine Co., 28 R. I. 126, 66 ... Atlantic, 58; Davison v. Casualty Co., 197 Mass ... 167, 83 N.E. 407; Henderson v. Casualty Co., 29 Pa ... Sup. Ct., 398; Maryland ... original case. Allen v. Ins. Co., 145 F. 881, 137 F ... 136; Connolly v. Bolster, 187 ... Casualty Co., 128 S.W. 204; Insurance ... Co. v. Cotton Mills, 85 S.W. 1090; Globe Co. v ... Casualty Co., 81 P ... 132 F. Rep. 623; Travelers' Insurance Co. v ... Henderson Cotton Mills, 85 S.W ... ...
-
Fairbanks Canning Co. v. London Guaranty and Accident Co.
... ... Corporation, Ltd., 94 Minn. 478; Cotton Mills v ... Insurance Co., 120 Ky. 218. (3) In such a ... Hubbard v. Missouri Reserve ... Assn., 80 F. 681; Ins. Co. v. Wolfe, 95 U.S ... 326, 333; Cabel v. Life Ins ... ...
-
Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. El Paso Electric Ry. Co.
...costs, damages, and interest on $5,000, and this construction is supported by the cases of Insurance Co. v. Henderson Cotton Mills, 120 Ky. 218, 85 S. W. 1090, 117 Am. St. Rep. 585, 9 Ann. Cas. 162; Southern Ry. News Co. v. Insurance Co., 83 S. W. 620, 26 Ky. Law Rep. 1217; Fidelity, etc., ......
-
Conqueror Zinc & Lead Co. v. Ætna Life Ins. Co.
...43 Atl. 503; Cudahy Packing Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. (C. C.) 132 Fed. 623; Travelers' Insurance Co. v. Henderson Cotton Mills, 120 Ky. 218, 85 S. W. 1090, 27 Ky. Law Rep. 653, 117 Am. St. Rep. 585, and many other cases; but our conclusion is that a fair construction of the terms of......