Traver v. Shaefle
Decision Date | 18 December 1891 |
Parties | TRAVER v. SHAEFLE ET AL. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
1. In an action based in part upon the fraudulent representations by the defendant as to the quality and value of goods sold and delivered, held, that evidence of the value of goods actually delivered was admissible.
2. A contract in writing, having been declared on and set out at length in the petition, which contained a clause providing that “all of said goods are to be selected by the said G. M. T.,” defendant, evidence by parol to the effect that plaintiffs had contracted with G. M. T., defendant, for goods of a different fashion, make, style, and quality from the goods actually selected by him, held erroneously admitted.
3. The rule of law is inflexible that the allegations and the proof, allegata et probata, must agree.
Error to district court, Lancaster county; FIELD, Judge.
Action by Benjamin F. Shaefle and Robert M. Thompson against George M. Traver to recover damages for deceit. Verdict and judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error. Reversed.J. R. Webster and E. P. Holmes, for plaintiff in error.
Pound & Burr, for defendants in error.
The plaintiffs below, on June 4, 1888, commenced this action in the district court of Lancaster county, alleging that on February 25, 1888, they entered into a contract with the defendant, as party of the first part, stating that he had sold to them goods, wares, and merchandise of certain quality, kinds, and amounts, mentioned in an inventory and Exhibit A, at a cost of $13,768, to be furnished the plaintiffs at the marked price, and all to be selected by the defendant. The plaintiffs were to pay for cooperage and cartage on the goods, delivered at defendant's store, in Lincoln, and to pay for all as follows: $5,000 in cash down, and $8,768 by the transfer of the following real estate: Lots 15 and 16 in block A in Davidson and Culver's addition to the town of Milford, in Seward county; also lot 3 in block No. I in Milford; also 640 acres of land in Cheyenne county, Neb., located 16 miles south of Kimball, being the same sold to the plaintiff Shaefle by the Union Pacific Railroad Company; also 12 lots in the city of Hastings, block 22 in Loman's addition to said city,--all of which the parties agreed to transfer or cause to be transferred to the defendant free of all incumbrance whatever, except that of $672 on the land in Cheyenne county, $1,000 on the block of lots in Hastings; the interest on the same to be paid to the date of contract; the goods to be selected and delivered by defendant on or before February 27, 1888. The following is a copy of the agreement herein referred to and of Exhibit A, thereto attached: Signed and witnessed.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦“Exhibit A. ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Ginghams ¦$ 100 ¦ ¦ ¦00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Light brown muslin ¦100 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Pillow-case cotton & sheeting ¦50 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Prints ¦100 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Overalls, jumpers, coats ¦100 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Cloaks & jerseys ¦567 25 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Underwear ¦400 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Table oil-cloth ¦5 70 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Fans ¦125 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Scarfs, jackets, hoods, leggins, etc ¦200 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Cottonades ¦98 60 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Cassimeres & jeans ¦300 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Oil clothing, etc ¦251 85 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Pipes ¦175 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Wh't goods dept ¦400 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Window curtains ¦175 50 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Skirts ¦76 77 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Velvets, brocades, farmers' satin & velveteen ¦600 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Hosiery ¦300 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Gloves ¦600 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Laces ¦200 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Embroideries & allovers ¦200 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Wallets & purses ¦100 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Ladies' neckwear ¦100 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Dress and cloak trimmings ¦300 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Silks, satins & surahs ¦600 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Soaps ¦100 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Jewelry ¦200 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Brushes ¦100 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Linens ¦150 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Tabling & napkins ¦150 00 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Draperies...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hensley v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company
...This rule has often been announced in this court and is no doubt a sound one. Clarke v. Omaha & S.W. R. Co., 5 Neb. 314; Traver v. Shaefle, 33 Neb. 531, 50 N.W. 683; Ayers v. Wolcott, 66 Neb. 712, 92 N.W. Cockins v. Bank of Alma, 84 Neb. 624, 122 N.W. 16; Boyd v. Lincoln & N. W. R. Co., 89 ......
-
Hensley v. Chi., St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.
...This rule has often been announced in this court and is no doubt a sound one. Clarke v. Omaha & S. W. R. Co., 5 Neb. 314;Traver v. Shaefle, 33 Neb. 531, 50 N. W. 683;Ayers v. Wolcott, 66 Neb. 712, 92 N. W. 1036;Cockins v. Bank of Alma, 84 Neb. 624, 122 N. W. 16, 133 Am. St. Rep. 642;Boyd v.......
- Traver v. Shaefle