Traynor's Will, In re

Decision Date08 February 1962
Citation226 N.Y.S.2d 304,34 Misc.2d 399
PartiesIn re TRAYNOR'S WILL. Petition of Harriet C. BICKERTON, as Administratrix c. t. a. of the goods, chattels and credits of Anne R. Traynor (a/k/a Annie R. Traynor), Deceased, for a construction of the Last Will and Testament of said Decedent. Surrogate's Court, Richmond County
CourtNew York Surrogate Court

Edmund J. Murphy and Charles A. Nolan, Staten Island, for administratrix c. t. a., Harriet C. Bickerton.

David R. J. Arnold, New York City, special guardian for Denis Hornbuckle, infant over the age of 14 years.

FRANK D. PAULO, Surrogate.

The Petitioner, Harriet C. Bickerton, Administratrix, with the Will annexed, brings on this proceeding to construe the Will of Anna R. Traynor, a/k/a Annie R. Traynor, Deceased.

The Decedent, Mrs. Traynor, at the time of her death was 89 years of age. The facts indicate that she executed her Will eight days before her death. The testamentary instrument is written in longhand on a printed form. The Decedent left her surviving Katherine Hornbuckle (designated in the Will as Catherine Frances Hornbuckle), her daughter; Harriet C. Bickerton (designated in the will as Harriett C. Bickerton), a daughter; Eugene O'Neill, a son; and two children of another son who predeceased the testatrix.

The pertinent provisions of the Will which require construction are Paragraphs Numbered 'Second' and the subparagraphs thereunder, which read in part as follows:

'Second:--I give, devise and bequeath to Mrs. Catherine Frances Hornbuckle and Mrs. Harriett C. Bickerton my interest in property on the corner of Prince and Mercer Street in New York City jointly.

'In case Mrs. Bickerton dies first, her interest will revert to Mrs. Hornbuckle.

'In case Mrs. Hornbuckle dies first her interest in said property will revert to her three children to share jointly.'

It is the opinion of the Court that the first paragraph of Paragraph 'Second' of the Will indicates an intent on the part of the Testatrix to devise her interest in said premises to her two named daughters equally in fee as tenants in common. The second and third subparagraphs of Paragraph 'Second' are construed by the Court as a void attempt by the Testatrix to impose limitations on the fee given in the first paragraph to her two daughters. See: Banzer v. Banzer, 156 N.Y. 429, 51 N.E. 291; Trask v. Sturges, 170 N.Y. 482, 63 N.E. 534.

The conditions expressed in the second and third subparagraphs of Paragraph 'Second', that is 'In case Mrs. Bickerton dies first * * *' and 'In case Mrs. Hornbuckle dies first * * *', were not intended by the Testatrix as imposing a condition that the daughters named in the Will or either of them, survive the Testatrix. When we...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Kurpiel v. Kurpiel
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 21, 1966
    ...rely (Overheiser v. Lackey, 207 N.Y. 229, 100 N.E. 738, Matter of Snell's Estate, 173 Misc. 282, 17 N.Y.S.2d 510, In re Traynor's Will, 34 Misc.2d 399, 226 N.Y.S.2d 304) are not applicable. In Overheiser a testator gave and devised "to my daughters Eliza Jane Marsh and Hester Marsh, jointly......
  • Buttonow, In re
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1966
    ...use of the word 'jointly' in a deed is not in and of itself sufficient to create a joint tenancy. For example, in Matter of Traynor's Will, 34 Misc.2d 399, 226 N.Y.S.2d 304, the court construed a devise to 'Mrs. Catherine Frances Hornbuckle and Mrs. Harriett C. Bickerton' of the decedent's ......
  • Lazarus v. Lazarus
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 10, 1962

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT