Tribbett v. Com.

Decision Date31 January 1978
Citation561 S.W.2d 662
PartiesPeter L. TRIBBETT, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky

Henry E. Hughes, Lexington, for appellant.

Robert F. Stephens, Atty. Gen., David M. Whalin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

LUKOWSKY, Justice.

Tribbett was convicted of the murder of Clarence Perciful, KRS 507.020, burglary in the first degree, KRS 511.020, and theft by unlawful taking, KRS 514.030, and sentenced by the Rockcastle Circuit Court to consecutive terms of imprisonment for life, ten and five years. He appeals.

The convictions are based on a completed conspiracy to murder Perciful and make off with his property. 1 Although Tribbett did not fire the weapon, he was an active participant in the entire episode which resulted in Perciful's death.

Tribbett assigns four points of error. Two of these contentions reflect a misunderstanding of the nature of the charges. He relies on the defense of renunciation of a criminal attempt set forth in KRS 506.020. Such reliance is totally misplaced. Tribbett was charged with and convicted of murder, not attempt to murder. Tribbett also claims that his convictions run afoul of the restrictions of KRS 506.050(2). Because he was neither charged with nor convicted of the substantive offense of conspiracy, this statute is irrelevant. The conspiracy merely constitutes the factual basis supporting the agency relationship which imposes criminal liability upon Tribbett for the conduct of his partners in crime. KRS 502.020(1)(a).

UB#PG=0000713,664]]3] Tribbett further contends that he could not be convicted of burglary as a matter of law because his entrance was not unlawful. Again his aim is faulty. The jury was not instructed on the "unlawful entry" aspect of burglary. It was instructed to find him guilty only if he remained in Perciful's dwelling without permission. Tribbett and his two companions were invited by Perciful into his home. As such they were mere licensees. Upon the death of the licensor, the license ceased and the privilege to be upon the premises lapsed. 3, Tiffany, Real Property, Sec. 836 (3rd ed. 1939); 53 C.J.S. Licenses § 87 (1948); 25 Am.Jur. 2d, Easements and Licenses, Sec. 131 (1966). Therefore, when they failed to leave, they remained unlawfully upon the premises within the meaning of the burglary statute. KRS 511.020, Commentary (iii) (1974).

Tribbett finally contends that convicting and sentencing him on the two offenses of burglary and theft which arose from the same transaction put him in double jeopardy. No such problem exists. The elements of these two crimes are different. Each of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Caudill v. Com., 2000-SC-0296-MR.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • June 12, 2003
    ... ... emphasize[] the unlawfulness of the intrusion ... Burglary is not committed by ... invited guests who enter buildings under privilege even though they have intention to commit a crime while there." 11 In fact, in Tribbett v. Commonwealth, 12 where the appellant obtained entry into the victim's home ostensibly in order to make use of the victim's firing range, 13 but actually to ... 120 S.W.3d 682 ... rob and murder the victim, the Court made no mention of today's majority opinion's "subterfuge" theory and, in ... ...
  • Bowling v. Com.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • April 24, 1997
    ...purposes of the business. Bowling terminated his license to be on the premises when he committed the criminal acts. In Tribbett v. Commonwealth, Ky., 561 S.W.2d 662 (1978), this Court upheld a burglary charge even though Tribbett was given permission to enter the dwelling of the victim, bec......
  • Ray v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 22, 1988
    ...removal of his property sufficient evidence that consent had been withdrawn, making subsequent remaining in unlawful); Tribbett v. Commonwealth, 561 S.W.2d 662 (Ky.1978) (defendant remained unlawfully after murder of occupant caused defendant's license to In the present case, the evidence d......
  • Fugate v. Com.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • June 17, 1999
    ...acts, such as crimes, inconsistent with the business. This rationale applies to the personal dwelling as well. See Tribbett Commonwealth, Ky., 561 S.W.2d 662 (1978). Reliance by Fugate on Hedges v. Commonwealth, Ky., 937 S.W.2d 703 (1996), which was raised only in the reply brief, is mispla......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT