Tribble v. State, 37764
| Decision Date | 22 January 1951 |
| Docket Number | No. 37764,37764 |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | TRIBBLE v. STATE. |
J. Larry Thompson, Bay Springs, for appellant.
J. P. Coleman, Atty. Gen., Geo. H. Ethridge, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Tribble was convicted of perjury and sentenced to the state penitentiary for ten years. The perjury consisted, the State alleged, in false testimony given by Tribble as a witness in the case of the State against Stafford Agee charged with the murder of Sam Ellis. The falsity consisted in the testimony of Tribble 'That he did not know who fired the shot that hit and killed Sam Ellis, that Sam Ellis had threatened to kill Stafford Agee'; that in truth he did know that Agee fired that shot and he also knew that Ellis had not threatened to kill Agee. The only proof of the falsity of the testimony of Tribble as given on the trial of the Agee case was contained in an affidavit made by Tribble after the shooting of Ellis and before the trial of Agee. In that extra judicium affidavit Tribble stated that Agee and Ellis were in an argument and a scuffle over a dollar and that Agee shot Ellis when Ellis had no weapon in his hand. The affidavit and the testimony were, of course, contradictory. However, there is no proof whatever of the falsity of the testimony except the contradictory statements of the accused. That is not enough to establish perjury under the former holdings of this Court and the authorities generally. Section 2315, Miss.Code 1942; Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455, 191 So. 282, 283; 41 Am.Jur. 37, Section 67. In the Horn case, the Court used this language , citing Hemphill v. State, 71 Miss. 877, 16 So. 261.
It was necessary for the State to prove the falsity of the testimony given as a witness. Not only was there no other witness who did that, but the conflicting statements of accused did not prove which statements were false, those in the affidavit or those given as a witness.
Reversed and appellant discharged.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hogan v. State
...722 (1901); Brown v. State, 57 Miss. 424, 436 (1879). Two conflicting statements under oath insufficient to convict; Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604, 50 So.2d 148 (1951) (two conflicting statements under oath insufficient); Brewer v. State, supra; Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857, 147 So.2d 499......
-
State v. Wallis
...are true or whether the testimony is true. The affidavit is, therefore, insufficient to sustain the conviction. Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604, 50 So.2d 148; Smyth v. Godwin, 188 Va. 753, 51 S.E.2d 230, 238; State v. Woolley, 109 Vt. 53, 62, 192 A. 1; People v. Burcham, 69 Cal.App. 614, 23......
-
Hall v. State, 98-KA-00746-COA.
...769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455, 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700, 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604, 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857, 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 2......
-
McFee v. State, 56493
...circumstances. Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455, 191 So. 282 (1939); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604, 50 So.2d 148 (1951); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700, 50 So.2d 567 (1951). Under the "two witness rule", McFee contends the conviction must fail as t......