Trobaugh v. Trobaugh
| Decision Date | 20 July 1955 |
| Citation | 81 So.2d 629 |
| Parties | Frances Hopper TROBAUGH, Appellant, v. Eugene R. TROBAUGH, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Lanas Troxler, Jacksonville, for appellant.
John W. Lee and William D. Barfiedd, Jacksonville, for appellee.
The appellee, plaintiff below, brought a suit for divorce against his wife, defendant below and appellant here, on the grounds of desertion and extreme cruelty. The defendant denied each of the grounds for divorce and interposed a plea of condonation. Trial of the issues was had before the Chancellor, who resolved the conflicts in the evidence in favor of the plaintiff, and entered a decree finding that the plaintiff had proved his charge of extreme cruelty. The defendant thereupon appealed, and thereafter the plaintiff filed his motion to affirm the decree on the ground that the questions involved were so unsubstantial as not to need further argument, within the meaning of Rule 38 of the Supreme Court Rules, 30 F.S.A.
We agree that the motion to affirm the decree should be granted. There was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding that the plaintiff had proved extreme cruelty, and we find no error in the holding of the court that the defendant did not sustain her defense of condonation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Horatio Enterprises, Inc. v. Rabin
...Court's opinion as to its appropriateness. Herzog v. Herzog, supra; Greenwood v. Oates, 251 So.2d 665 (Fla.1971); Trobaugh v. Trobaugh, 81 So.2d 629 (Fla.1955); Glass v. Parrish, 51 So.2d 717 Helman, 349 So.2d at 1189 (emphasis added). The record in this case amply supports the trial court'......
-
Banco do Brasil, S.A. v. City Nat. Bank of Miami
...Court's opinion as to its appropriateness. Herzog v. Herzog, supra; Greenwood v. Oates, 251 So.2d 665 (Fla.1971); Trobaugh v. Trobaugh, 81 So.2d 629 (Fla.1955); Glass v. Parrish, 51 So.2d 717 (Fla.1951). 349 So.2d at 1189 (emphasis added). The record in this case amply supports the trial co......
-
Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.
...Court's opinion as to its appropriateness. Herzog v. Herzog,supra ; Greenwood v. Oates, 251 So.2d 665 (Fla.1971); Trobaugh v. Trobaugh, 81 So.2d 629 (Fla.1955); Glass v. Parrish, 51 So.2d 717 (Fla.1951). Finally, the question of whether defendant's negligence was the proximate cause of the ......
-
S. Kornreich & Sons, Inc. v. Titan Agencies, Inc., s. 81-697
...there is substantial evidence which supports the damages as determined by the court, thus, this finding must be affirmed. Trobaugh v. Trobaugh, 81 So.2d 629 (Fla.1955); City of Miami Beach v. Fein, 263 So.2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Cone v. Cone, 114 So.2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959). Kornreich a......