Tropp v. State

Decision Date31 January 1920
Docket NumberA-3396.
Citation186 P. 737,17 Okla.Crim. 702
PartiesTROPP et al. v. STATE.
CourtUnited States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Syllabus by Editorial Staff.

A joint appeal from a conviction against each of two defendants for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law would be dismissed where the record showed that it was not perfected within the time required by the statutes governing appeals in misdemeanor cases.

Where defendants were each convicted of a violation of the prohibitory liquor laws, and the trial court after time allowed by statute for filing the appeal issued commitments, and they were confined to county jail when pretended appeal was lodged therein, and had since served their respective terms of imprisonment, the appeal would be dismissed, as any legal case involved was moot.

Appeal from County Court, Payne County; Wilberforce Jones, Judges.

R. A. Tropp and Will Andrews were convicted of a violation of the prohibitory liquor laws, and they appeal. Appeal dismissed.

Robt. A. Lowry, of Stillwater, for plaintiffs in error.

S. P. Freeling, Atty. Gen., R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. C. Suman, Co. Atty., of Stillwater, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

This is a joint appeal by the defendants from a judgment of conviction against each for a violation of the prohibitory liquor laws.

The Attorney General, shortly after the appeal was lodged in this court, filed a motion to dismiss the same on the ground that said appeal was not perfected within the time allowed by statute for appeals in misdemeanor cases. There has been no response to said motion by either of the defendants.

Further, the record discloses that the trial court, after the time allowed by statute for filing the appeal in this court had expired, issued commitments for each of these defendants, and that they were confined in the county jail of Payne county thereunder at the time the pretended appeal was lodged herein.

The appeal is dismissed for two reasons:

First, because the record shows that it was not perfected within the time required by the statutes governing appeals in misdemeanor cases.

Second, for the reason that, each defendant having been committed to jail under said judgment, they have long since served their respective terms of imprisonment, any legal question involved in this pretended appeal is moot.

Mandate forthwith.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Dorser v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
    • February 7, 1920

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT