Trowbridge v. Kansas City & W. B. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 04 October 1915 |
Docket Number | No. 11639.,11639. |
Citation | 192 Mo. App. 52,179 S.W. 777 |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Parties | TROWBRIDGE v. KANSAS CITY & W. B. RY. CO. |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W. O. Thomas, Judge.
Action by William Edward Trowbridge against the Kansas City & Westport Belt Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
John H. Lucas, of Kansas City, for appellant. Watson, Watson & Alford, of Kansas City, for respondent.
In this case damages are sought under the federal Employers' Liability Act, for personal injuries received by plaintiff while employed as a switchman in defendant's yard.
The principal contention of the defendant, and the one to be first considered (since it will effectually dispose of the case if defendant is right), is that plaintiff was not engaged in interstate commerce at the time he received his injury. To create a right of recovery under the federal act in question, not only must the employer be a common carrier by railroad engaged in interstate commerce, but the injury must have occurred "when the particular service in which the employé is engaged is a part of interstate commerce." Illinois Central R. Co. v. Behrens, 233 U. S. 473, 34 Sup. Ct. 646, 58 L. Ed. 1051, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 163.
There is no question but that defendant was, and is, a common carrier by railroad, and it was, and is, engaged in interstate commerce. Defendant's railroad is about nine miles long, and extends from Thirty-Ninth street and Westport avenue in Kansas City, Mo., to Dodson, Mo. This last-named point is not far from the Kansas line. At Dodson the road connects with the Missouri Pacific, the Kansas City Southern, and the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroads. It receives freight in car load lots, coming from points on these railroads outside of the state of Missouri, consigned to points on defendant's line of railway within this state. Defendant operated its road under a regular tariff filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission, and under this tariff collected its charges on all cars that came to it from Kansas or elsewhere outside of Missouri. These incoming cars were billed to Dodson, Mo., but, as a matter of fact, they went on through to the various points along defendant's line of railway, being transported by defendant from Dodson to their various destinations. When cars thus received and transported had been unloaded by their consignees, defendant took them back to Dodson and set them on its switches, from whence they were taken by the particular connecting road over which they had come to defendant's line. Empty cars, thus taken back to Dodson by defendant, were not billed to any point, but were merely taken there where the road which had brought them loaded to defendant either sent them back to point of origin or elsewhere as it chose. Defendant in bringing the empty cars back to the road it got them from did so without ascertaining or inquiring where they were going after being taken charge of by the connecting road.
On July 3, 1913, a box car loaded with brick and consigned to Coen Building Material Company, located on defendant's line, was received at Dodson, Mo., by defendant, having been shipped from Buffville, Kan., over the Missouri Pacific, and was transported from Dodson by defendant to its consignee. The car was unloaded, and on July 8th plaintiff was injured while engaged, as an employé of defendant, in switching the car preparatory to returning it to Dodson to be there again taken charge of by the Missouri Pacific. At that time the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company had given orders at Dodson that all box cars should be sent west to a point in Kansas, to be there loaded with wheat. After plaintiff's injury, the car he was attempting to couple was, on the same day, taken to Dodson, from whence it was, on the 9th of July, by the Missouri Pacific Railroad, sent west to Osawatomie, Kan., the place where said road was at that time sending every freight car suitable for hauling wheat to Eastern markets, and from which place said cars were distributed to the points where they were needed for that purpose. The evidence further shows, not only that that car, but others coming in loaded from Kansas, came on through Dodson, without unloading, to their destinations at points along defendant's line in Missouri, and that after defendant had delivered them to their consignees and they had been unloaded, defendant would return the cars to the Missouri Pacific at Dodson, and from thence they would be taken west to the point from whence they originated. The train that took the particular car in question west from Dodson, Mo., to Osawatomie, Kan., was a local freight which ran every day from Osawatomie, Kan., to Kansas City, Mo., and return. Cars going west on that local went to Osawatomie, from whence they were distributed to various points as hereinbefore stated.
The disputed question now under consideration is whether the movement of the particular car sought to be coupled at the time of the injury was a part of interstate commerce. If so, then the particular service being rendered by the plaintiff, at the time he was hurt, was a part of such commerce, and, in that event, the federal act applies.
So that the participation by the defendant in the transportation of this shipment was undoubtedly a participation in interstate commerce. And this is true regardless of the fact that the car was billed to Dodson. Neither it nor other cars stopped there, but went on through to the point of delivery. It is the nature of the service performed by the carrier, and not the way in which goods are billed, that determines whether the carriage is interstate or not. Ohio Railroad Commission v. Worthington, 225 U. S. 101, 32 Sup. Ct. 653, 56 L. Ed. 1004; Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 219 U. S. 498, 31 Sup. Ct. 279, 55 L. Ed. 310. The service performed by the defendant in the case at bar is quite of the same nature as that performed by the Chicago Junction Railway Company and the Union Stockyard & Transfer Company in the case of the United States v. Union Stockyard & Transfer Co., 226 U. S. 286, 33 Sup. Ct. 83, 57 L. Ed. 226. The railway in that case operated wholly within the city of Chicago, and neither of the corporations issued through bills of lading. The Supreme Court held that the fact that the service is performed wholly in one state makes no difference if it is a part of interstate commerce, that "it is the character of the service rendered, not the manner in which goods are billed, which determines the interstate character of the service," and that the corporations were engaged in interstate commerce.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hamarstrom v. M.K.T. Ry. Co.
... 116 S.W.2d 280 ... MARY L. HAMARSTROM, CLAIMANT, RESPONDENT, ... MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RY. CO., APPELLANT ... No. 18850 ... Kansas City Court of Appeals. Missouri ... McCoy (Tex. Civ. App.), 215 S.W. 870; Johnson v. Great Northern R.R. Co., 178 Fed. 643; Trowbridge v. Kansas City & W.B. Ry. Co., 192 Mo. App. 52, 179 S.W. 777. (2) Defendant's liability for damages ... ...
-
State ex rel. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Shain
... ... Hopkins B. Shain, Ewing C. Bland and Robert M. Reynolds, Judges of the Kansas City Court of Appeals No. 36184 Supreme Court of Missouri February 7, 1939 ... Writ ... Carl ... S. Hoffman, ... Thompson v. Wab. Ry ... Co., 262 Mo. 468, 171 S.W. 364; LaLone v. Terminal ... Ry. Co., 316 Mo. 835, 293 S.W. 379; Trowbridge v. K ... C. W. B. Ry. Co., 192 Mo.App. 52, 179 S.W. 777; ... Kepner v. Cleveland C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 322 Mo ... 299, 15 S.W.2d 825. (4) ... ...
-
Hamarstrom v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.
... ... 1103 MARY L. HAMARSTROM, CLAIMANT, RESPONDENT, v. MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RY. CO., APPELLANT Court of Appeals of Missouri, Kansas City" April 4, 1938 ... Appeal ... from the Circuit Court of Jackson County.--Hon. Darius A ... Brown, Judge ... \xC2" ... 748; McAdoo v. McCoy ... (Tex. Civ. App.), 215 S.W. 870; Johnson v. Great ... Northern R. R. Co., 178 F. 643; Trowbridge v. Kansas ... City & W. B. Ry. Co., 192 Mo.App. 52, 179 S.W. 777. (2) ... Defendant's liability for damages for the injuries ... suffered by ... ...
-
Spaw v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.
... ... Union Stock Yard & Transfer Co., 226 U.S. 286, 57 L.Ed. 226, 33 S.Ct. 83; ... Ohio Railroad Commission v. Worthington, 225 U.S ... 101, 56 L.Ed. 1004, 32 S.Ct. 653; Southern Pacific ... Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 219 U.S ... 498, 55 L.Ed. 310, 31 S.Ct. 279; Trowbridge v. Kansas ... City, etc., R. Co., 192 Mo.App. 52, 179 S.W. 777; ... Interstate Commerce Act, as amended June 29, 1906, 34 Stats ... at Large, p. 584, chapter 3591.] All railroads in this State ... are required to engage in interstate commerce, and it would ... seem that, even if the record ... ...